[tcpm] Minor rev to draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Mon, 13 November 2017 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65806124B0A for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:00:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJPKbW_9UE6s for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EE6126DD9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:00:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zGCUClhIN+CNmJkHrL+FcYXoNTWuf/7VtbqUHsNhtmg=; b=MjXKcN4TMyDOkCFNEeCks6SQt qh6h5RBYnsgm0OjNcDet67Wq7BZk86zi2QNKgPZFtIrtgO+NSEUK2ruJGR8zN4PmVHVPc1EXOkLBz HgyPb8ldRLfOdlt6B7U/E33G1Lw/sQC8ONC7N5iK8bg/0CPJmlJRnM6o2BonHXlEQz9nAujU2GVY/ aRc874bDj+Z/BWP5Mv4bI4QsZTQrdjmWx4+szMYI5BPxBXkN7BejCP0dCcrRQjpNOyJigaBefy1XN 3eKcFFbqtLpnkJwc3No6fRI5kD0JAva8p2+qp1qFdQoJxymrrQt6eVi0iFdG0jtpEi343/p1vPiEP 8XgQ/3l0A==;
Received: from [101.127.176.77] (port=52654 helo=[192.168.0.106]) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1eE6re-0006xd-1S; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:00:54 +0000
To: IETF tcpm mailing list <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <151054842265.21374.8946387844025665185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@gmx.at>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <2034c9f6-36e8-4287-680c-bef69065701c@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:00:45 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <151054842265.21374.8946387844025665185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CCA4146D3EBB70940E6FE1D3"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/TlT1FbMJMv6wjC4yuX2iDS1wYxw>
Subject: [tcpm] Minor rev to draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:00:58 -0000

Folks,

We've just posted a minor rev to the AccECN draft, URLs below. Summary 
of diffs:

  * AccECN applicability is irrespective of whether ECN (of whatever
    flavour) is in the network.
  * Details missed in the previous rev wrt testing for IP/ECN mangling
    of SYN/ACK:
      o Defines what exactly the 3rd ACK of the 3WHS is  (by ACKNO),
        which includes ACK of retransmission of SYN/ACK
      o Implications if 3rd ACK of 3WHS doesn't arrive.
  * Also, ironically, added some acknowledgements (of human effort).

Now we reckon it's really ready for WGLC.

Cheers


Bob


On 13/11/2017 12:47, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Bob Briscoe and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:		draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn
> Revision:	05
> Title:		More Accurate ECN Feedback in TCP
> Document date:	2017-11-11
> Group:		tcpm
> Pages:		43
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-05
>
> Abstract:
>     Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) is a mechanism where network
>     nodes can mark IP packets instead of dropping them to indicate
>     incipient congestion to the end-points.  Receivers with an ECN-
>     capable transport protocol feed back this information to the sender.
>     ECN is specified for TCP in such a way that only one feedback signal
>     can be transmitted per Round-Trip Time (RTT).  Recently, new TCP
>     mechanisms like Congestion Exposure (ConEx) or Data Center TCP
>     (DCTCP) need more accurate ECN feedback information whenever more
>     than one marking is received in one RTT.  This document specifies an
>     experimental scheme to provide more than one feedback signal per RTT
>     in the TCP header.  Given TCP header space is scarce, it overloads
>     the three existing ECN-related flags in the TCP header and provides
>     additional information in a new TCP option.
>
>                                                                                    
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>