Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-09.txt

Per Hurtig <per.hurtig@kau.se> Wed, 21 October 2015 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=0736d2b55e=per.hurtig@kau.se>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAE41ACDA1 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AnJ7shIfnxXc for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nasse.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096FB1ACD60 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Processed: mail.kau.se, Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:55:19 +0200 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDRemoteIP: 193.157.119.161
X-MDHelo: eduroam-193-157-119-161.uio.no
X-MDArrival-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:55:19 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: per.hurtig@kau.se
X-Return-Path: per.hurtig@kau.se
X-Envelope-From: per.hurtig@kau.se
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3240B8A1-FF4E-4749-B49A-7574939CF5B7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Per Hurtig <per.hurtig@kau.se>
In-Reply-To: <20151020193954.12955.50870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:55:11 +0200
Message-Id: <3500BC2B-A986-4AC8-BEF0-4709DEFE5D35@kau.se>
References: <20151020193954.12955.50870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/U667AopKOvGupJPBmTTwn5OWpSA>
Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, barryleiba@computer.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-09.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:55:30 -0000

Hi,

the new draft on RTO restart address the following comments from the IESG (thanks for the feedback):

o  Clarified, in the abstract, that the modified restart causes a smaller retransmission delay in total.

o  Clarified, in the introduction, that the fast retransmit algorithm may cause retransmissions upon
    receiving duplicate acknowledgments, not that it unconditionally does so.

o  Changed wording from "to proposed standard" to "to the standards track".

o  Changed algorithm description so that a TCP sender MUST track the time elapsed since the
    transmission of the earliest outstanding segment. This was not explicitly stated in previous
    versions of the draft.


Cheers,
Per

> On 20 Oct 2015, at 21:39, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : TCP and SCTP RTO Restart
>        Authors         : Per Hurtig
>                          Anna Brunstrom
>                          Andreas Petlund
>                          Michael Welzl
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-09.txt
> 	Pages           : 17
> 	Date            : 2015-10-20
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document describes a modified sender-side algorithm for managing
>   the TCP and SCTP retransmission timers that provides faster loss
>   recovery when there is a small amount of outstanding data for a
>   connection.  The modification, RTO Restart (RTOR), allows the
>   transport to restart its retransmission timer using a smaller delay,
>   so that the effective RTO becomes more aggressive in situations where
>   fast retransmit cannot be used.  This enables faster loss detection
>   and recovery for connections that are short-lived or application-
>   limited.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-09
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-09
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm