[tcpm] ECN++: text on congestion response to CE on pure ACKs

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Mon, 05 November 2018 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36AC130F04; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYyl1h3ny6z1; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from virgo02.ee.ethz.ch (virgo02.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.72.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD00130E9F; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virgo02.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42pTyf0zdVz15Lp3; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:52:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at virgo02.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from virgo02.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virgo02.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-Ubp4RYt-iB; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:52:08 +0100 (CET)
X-MtScore: NO score=0
Received: from dhcp-821a.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-821a.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.130.26]) by virgo02.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:52:07 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <627FA33A-9F92-4473-B94E-27D6783F441F@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:52:03 +0700
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
To: draft-ietf-tcpm-generalized-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Vo48X7zsVyhKSEOlxT1wGieoDyY>
Subject: [tcpm] ECN++: text on congestion response to CE on pure ACKs
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:52:22 -0000

Hi Bob, hi all,

based on the discussion we just had in the session, I would like to propose to eventually add an section on goals of the experiments (which is anything recommended) and potentially move any discussion about responses to CE markings on pure ACK (as just presented) there as one question that needs experimentation.

Mirja