Re: [tcpm] Linux doesn’t implement RFC3465

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Mon, 02 August 2021 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7428A3A1F60 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMLx5ejSDJ3w for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E0F73A1F58 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 19-20020a9d08930000b02904b98d90c82cso19008204otf.5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=lZmnhYC0o0rptmiRxpXFug0CveWfFE8xZgQ9f+ZCOpU=; b=NdvB3oaSNQzHBjCFiYKnbvftgzt6IOfBy7yrr6076NLd03XHUtwRTAhUIpv++P+foc zQ7vCAYr9i2QhGXFiVjFQlDE2YwRSY6sc7yulVzkPjTkjN6Ik2KbJvJ5z+HR+Ipf1KIX l+mWX4uyqD7rfBwLiydXdZeRwAPXvJP/tHOktw90laiqplII+Jn8/WaPsy0kqWcLXnix V0QTUUR5CzKlk7b9CX7tC4h4+R6/NDTBaS0qzeaAI6DMWAT+2qx5c2TVACtlTmnfOv2R GqznKfCqo15AcFRnRUcpjEiFstZVc/L+YbvZlXghk05go3SdZZ64ATT36fjn9WFrZniG lrWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gKET2Xxf7snlJezziFF1ZCJYygoumXLeKT07Z4Y3sKmn4Q58U fQ86cqklyoGAymQpNcb8u3ckdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp4kjeEhITBaG/MHEl/eSLo4lAY7qn7dN2HSp+DJq64LZpY5EAUPIb8WqcxMJOJqlyjHYOZw==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3a49:: with SMTP id j67mr14374608otc.114.1627943822576; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.208] (162-203-32-211.lightspeed.bcvloh.sbcglobal.net. [162.203.32.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r1sm1965762ooi.21.2021.08.02.15.37.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Mark Allman" <mallman@icir.org>
To: "Yuchung Cheng" <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: "Vidhi Goel" <vidhi_goel@apple.com>, "Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>, Extensions <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:36:59 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <A39F73BE-4BF1-479D-911F-0CAC6D91D924@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=c+KeQxWJq0e98hY9XsQ2vhdr3SiKkypC7kwdZbBRgdXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <78EF3761-7CAF-459E-A4C0-57CDEAFEA8EE@apple.com> <CADVnQynkBxTdapXN0rWOuWO3KXQ2qb6x=xhB35XrMU38JkX2DQ@mail.gmail.com> <601D9D4F-A82C-475A-98CC-383C1F876C44@apple.com> <54699CC9-C8F5-4CA3-8815-F7A21AE10429@icsi.berkeley.edu> <DF5EF1C7-0940-478A-9518-62185A79A288@apple.com> <E150D881-4AB3-4AEA-BE0C-1D4B47B2C531@icir.org> <CADVnQynjE+D-OSvdOVROjT3y1cnHHWqdNQSmphLAJ+HsBTUAJQ@mail.gmail.com> <A1B50403-2405-4348-9626-025D255DEAE7@icir.org> <CADVnQykM8p-bVz_oPrje1yNh9_7_isAUL+wnQWDoY9Gs18sLPQ@mail.gmail.com> <11FE4818-87E7-4FD8-8F45-E19CD9A3366A@apple.com> <CAK6E8=fFWAE_NSr45i2mdh6NmYDusUFW3GYGtuo-FcL07sox9A@mail.gmail.com> <D6B865F7-9865-4B6F-986B-F44ABE5F12B0@apple.com> <756432D9-4331-454D-82EB-346CF54A355E@icir.org> <CAK6E8=c+KeQxWJq0e98hY9XsQ2vhdr3SiKkypC7kwdZbBRgdXA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_51DB9368-A7E2-4E66-BED2-3CC48D2BEEE3_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/W27Vq69socAHS01gkI4iTBEunno>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] =?utf-8?q?Linux_doesn=E2=80=99t_implement_RFC3465?=
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:37:10 -0000

> The fact is that Linux CC has long moved to infinite L since 2031,

So, if our experience is with L=\infinity and it is demonstrably OK
why don't we say *THAT* instead of "make L=5 or L=10"?  I would
submit that it makes more sense to leverage experience than it does
to make things up.

allman