IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus-03

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Thu, 14 May 2020 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F993A09B1 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18AprHPYK6ud for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com (mail-oi1-f181.google.com [209.85.167.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4253A09AE for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id x7so23391891oic.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=UjQkMaOcwzYJfxnvJZp+a2MkLNKVerDQPiaQHKDyZrc=; b=PRgU0i5qgl2wnuj5tp5zBKM4P3UT38w1GevvsCeCX9bqYBX7vpzOgcJNPDIn6zSISn op2asKikoVQirLqrc4hOUAuDIx62zsX0vsA89aUMuWJz5gWOoafqfP1RzzItWmka1dh8 9ilawvtmyxu14/aTrdmPrhYNqPO06ULqImf0j50pMceKm6+tNgMTxeQi6sxPezbFrslC pBngYNRzINuZRlRkBxaoEOLfrhVR/C8RrkkU2A5XcMxYiy+BtiaT8Wom3xsK+kZL8bxG +U2xR9jn/5OD6dwfae70z5QDX1DWtdZHRSCCJKnCKpjsvUKPQ2rkbuf0xN5GpDWZCgvY zbhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZy3TaYTDAtUHlrbHebh+smw3X+rii5AWBG0uJQsLJ1jTmWd5IG NT6Z/96GVZaK4Seih3++/mxArw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLFdeJdwz2axq0DBwVwFptQ6c9Xaw/U9rEVZZR0LeCT+pA7KlnyFUiNoTrRj7ukLVbwlc8KfA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:49:: with SMTP id v9mr29334971oic.41.1589457983230; Thu, 14 May 2020 05:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:dc6a:a02b:e93b:f2a8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f25sm742962ooj.20.2020.05.14.05.06.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 May 2020 05:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:06:21 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <B581E2C0-D2EF-4AAE-951B-27A404A6427F@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <D963CFA8-5851-40EE-BA70-2522BB99C1C1@fh-muenster.de>
References: <D963CFA8-5851-40EE-BA70-2522BB99C1C1@fh-muenster.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_B8D9E803-FBE0-434A-8070-6853632CBA17_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/WCJyNk2t1pdv07Qe4MGhYQlPTwQ>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:06:27 -0000

> this mail starts a WG adoption call for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus-03
>
> The intended status would be PS.

Per note from the other day, I think this could get there, but the
current document doesn't offer enough (any, really) motivation that
suggests HyStart++ is useful or effective.  Since I can't figure
that out, I can't support the document for WG adoption at the moment
(and especially so at PS).

allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email