Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: support for NATs

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 12 August 2008 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3BA3A6A56; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B895D3A68FD for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZfCR3gz5ZUa for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C067A3A6A56 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,192,1217808000"; d="scan'208";a="40981202"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Aug 2008 01:53:55 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m7C1rs9w001436; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:53:54 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7C1rsRT004548; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:53:54 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Ted Faber' <faber@ISI.EDU>
References: <48A08295.8090903@juniper.net> <20080811184214.B300B50846@romeo.rtfm.com> <03d901c8fbe9$05673220$23d946ab@cisco.com> <20080811234626.GB2194@zod.isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:53:54 -0700
Message-ID: <017201c8fc1e$4700c3b0$23d946ab@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <20080811234626.GB2194@zod.isi.edu>
Thread-Index: Acj8DKUc3ggvx5PxRsalStwpTZct6AAEXOgA
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1356; t=1218506035; x=1219370035; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[tcpm]=20tcp-auth-opt=20issue=3A=20supp ort=20for=20NATs |Sender:=20; bh=6/JWJCJA0LmSgBJtE6fpP3b89yL3BBH66uXKg5bKyrw=; b=ANebQDR7jfudhvy+thcpW/f90vH8hDzxGQ1UPl0rIHGZ40XAHdEeKXK9xJ XxtBGrZ+dCHb+gKwoICI2inGABZF/m3SkmVI6zcxj7Vl8KP1tXrIFR++crKq gHWz5qTLem;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: 'Adam Langley' <agl@imperialviolet.org>, tcpm@ietf.org, 'Joe Touch' <touch@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: support for NATs
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Faber [mailto:faber@ISI.EDU] 
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:46 PM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: 'Eric Rescorla'; 'Ron Bonica'; 'Adam Langley'; 
> tcpm@ietf.org; 'Joe Touch'
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: support for NATs
> 
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:32:41PM -0700, Dan Wing wrote:
> > > - Key-ids must be globally unique.
> > > - You need to know the other side's IP address, even if 
> you're doing
> > >   a passive open.
> > 
> > Adding 32 bits to the key-id would create the same global uniqueness
> > that using the source IPv4 addresses accomplishes.
> 
> There's a little more to a establishing a global namespace than
> allocating the bits.  Using the IP address is capitalizing on the IP
> address allocation authorities and routing systems to keep those
> addresses unique at any given time (and "unique" is somewhat 
> approximate even with those mechanisms).
> 
> One can establish a global namespace here if needed, but 
> there's more to
> do than allocate the field space.

So you want something exceeding "the same global uniqueness" of a v4 address.

-d


> -- 
> Ted Faber
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: 
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See 
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
> 

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm