Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry-00.txt
Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1E312092A for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:36:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.217
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UH8DbNjCKoOZ for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5928120934 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:35:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=h7cR+Xu9mbWLBEr+mruDs5y8/zI1nyL6Tqtd/cUZh98=; b=v/uaoEb0ZWIcCh0kjpREAJUG26 BG3bPwwQYeYXpnQ5odE2vSAZFvIzliQxnZ1/P8l0EYGYJzpLZXmBxo2XzWvNMi8SrVu5j/aN6pSdA RKzVaUJQf3wWsVEfaS1WiL0ZDBrEZfPOFiGr/mgC23a1/KnMs1agTBoLEcfEaaSX5b4fEh3lj6uyZ 7yevTGCfEju+1DNpKTKMf3btI6o2YGM/SRA+Qab+6otUYJ7E9PR7QdYsAty9v+Wj4pXHBkYyU3rT1 4GvKEsm/VQVk9sSUf8/cdcB3GgniQ/q85v2K1FAbKCQVoXBu99b22ju8L56X02V1Lyd45OJLSY4Yd PNYSpo+w==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:60319 helo=[192.168.1.6]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1iX4bg-001PBu-9y; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:35:57 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-98FCAA27-0B54-4EEC-8F7C-3169117F6055"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <78356B52-DF62-4FB9-BE5C-4E77E29615CE@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:35:51 -0800
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <86871EE9-13AA-4821-B603-AF2F68A01CF1@strayalpha.com>
References: <78356B52-DF62-4FB9-BE5C-4E77E29615CE@ericsson.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17B102)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/WTdx0Vv28lprn2MfsHxxoD-k5Ng>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:36:01 -0000
I thought the point of the draft deadline was to prevent this sort of last minute stuff, **especially** for 00 drafts. Interesting to see the IESG doing the end run. Can we now stop this silly closure of the submission window, now that it **officially** isn’t relevant? Joe > On Nov 19, 2019, at 1:53 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > I just submitted a short draft yesterday with a proposal to change the policy for the tcp flags registry. This proposal as well as other options are on the agenda for discussion on Friday. But please have a look and if you have comments you can also of course provide them beforehand to the list! > > Thanks, > Mirja > > > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > >> Von: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> Datum: 18. November 2019 um 11:51:20 GMT+8 >> An: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com> >> Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry-00.txt >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Mirja Kuehlewind and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry >> Revision: 00 >> Title: Registration Policy for TCP Header Flags >> Document date: 2019-11-18 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 5 >> URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry-00.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry/ >> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry-00 >> Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-flags-registry >> >> >> Abstract: >> RFC2780 specifies the registration policy for reserved TCP header >> flags as Standards Action. RFC3168 created an IANA registry for >> these header flags and registered bit 8 (CWR) and 9 (ECE). This >> draft changes the registration policy of the registration to IETF >> Review as usually new TCP mechanisms that could use the remaining >> reserved flags will be first specified as experimental. Not noting >> any of those experiments in the registry would undermine the purpose >> of having a registry. However, care must be taken, as only a few >> reserved flags are left and if a new (experimental) mechanism sees >> deployment in the Internet, the flag cannot be unassigned anymore or >> used for something else. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ku… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Joe Touch