Re: [tcpm] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-06: (with COMMENT)

FWIW - I tried to update the boilerplate beyond the “Revised” issue and ID-NITS complained.

Joe
—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

> On Mar 1, 2022, at 9:57 AM, touch@strayalpha.com wrote:
> 
> Hi, Lars,
> ...
> 
> As to boilerplate, it would be easier to keep current if it were kept *stable*. I’ll see what I can do to sync it, but I will leave verification of that to the RFC Editor.
> 
> Joe
> 
> —
> Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
> www.strayalpha.com <http://www.strayalpha.com/>
> 
>> On Mar 1, 2022, at 7:42 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-06: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ <https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/> 
>> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> The datatracker state does not indicate whether to include the
>> consensus boilerplate for this document.
>> 
>> Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for background and more
>> guidance:
>> 
>> * Terms "master" and "master_key"; alternatives might be "active",
>>   "central", "initiator", "leader", "main", "orchestrator", "parent",
>>   "primary", "server".
>> 
>> Thanks to Peter E. Yee for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
>> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/CHS1WZam2FsNmxLR2z9sutDZzj0).
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
>> address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
>> automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
>> will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
>> did with these suggestions.
>> 
>> Document still refers to the "Simplified BSD License", which was corrected in
>> the TLP on September 21, 2021. It should instead refer to the "Revised BSD
>> License". The document boilerplate overall seems to be 10+ years out of date.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm