Re: [tcpm] [OPSEC] draft-gont-tcp-security

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 27 April 2009 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE943A700E; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.223, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40fg2yiMcT38; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:2060:40:1::123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70D028C1B8; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lars-2.vzbi.com (lars-2.vzbi.com [166.58.67.119]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3RKMY2e081933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:22:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <88ACD16A-1137-4E55-871F-8F0C992D7A63@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <49EE1873.1090907@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-32-563544112"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:22:28 -0400
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB221318F5E8@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.g ov><49E36AB9.40507@isi.edu> <49E384E9.1050106@gont.com.ar><49E3878C.9080200@isi.edu> <49E39119.1060902@gont.com.ar> <B01905DA0C7CDC478F42870679DF0F1004BC4176D0@qtdenexmbm24.AD.QINTRA.COM> <49E3A88F.9060301@gont.com.ar> <49E3ABC0.1050601@isi.edu> <49E3B9BF.1060901@gont.com.ar> <49E3BED9.1030701@isi.edu> <C9E987CC-0213-4C67-BA0A-11C736772EE7@nokia.com> <49E4D257.40504@gont.com.ar> <49E4E233.9040609@earthlink.net> <EC5F7E6A-0393-41CC-B4DF-BCD134FF4EF5@nokia.com> <49E5F36D.7020808@earthlink.net> <A9D3331F-FDE6-4500-8650-3F94B0A78C2E@nokia.com> <49EE1873.1090907@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (mail.fit.nokia.com [212.213.221.39]); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:22:36 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [OPSEC] draft-gont-tcp-security
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:21:44 -0000

[Trimming the CC list to the relevant WGs.]

Hi,

On 2009-4-21, at 15:03, Fernando Gont wrote:
> P.S.: Is there any specific proposal/advice to pursue this effort?
> There's has been some talk about tcpm vs opsec, but so far it is not
> clear to me how to proceed here.

if the IETF decides to work on this, I believe TCPM would be the most  
appropriate group, given that that's where the TCP expertise is. I'm  
fully OK with doing this in cooperation with OPSEC, maybe via a joint  
WG last call or other means, if they desire this.

One question: If the IETF decides to publish a document in this space,  
and if you decide to offer draft-gont-tcp-security as a starting point  
for this work, are the UK CNPI and you as the author OK with the IETF  
WG obtaining change control? The WG consensus process would likely  
lead to changes compared to the current version, probably even  
significant changes.

Lars