[tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 01 February 2022 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C603A1958; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:43:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E-xImc_F1Bau; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F213A195D; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id j12so13426033qtr.2; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:43:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LAdJ6HtyOJI1pF5YpZCVMz9I/cICpcQkCO0LdHnlkEM=; b=Wqw13WD9i4gHQiPnPlLSgHEeXItOGwpFeMhxm8jDhB16yWQCFbO8LyVxnvCKuQAgct T70QhJa/0p79sh4HEzRIEKnAb6CYhU8J/nFOWwgtoDeHvTXPQgFKouTc/QCm5w1e6xbC YiCJzOh+3452N9GcV9NREnlyWTt3940Hap2aLQ+vVeUjO6nrEnSEIf+8fIMyZFkJ/YFZ OBLL4yUxss+49FeRy65IJy0IydXx6QI/O50XpLh2H6nT7XF/uNoAjxJyDD/5SiyaPNxk srU5zMdnTkZOhAMA/Zni1eKdzaCRVTsRpkF0o5T7IzL2uB5sROdlZRVtBvarY4qFNkb6 jVHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LAdJ6HtyOJI1pF5YpZCVMz9I/cICpcQkCO0LdHnlkEM=; b=ZWTHk1fp2gC2Q9/jU/DWF8VSwF9BQ5wvR8afWJWXIkeXilGUmcSLVjuBkFTzQfWBy4 3iwTx2IqRENHksvNzwuQd1Ujuq4AOvE7146YpGq4MUTHfCCOvULTrwTLPVOa1k/eY1vq x82EfmsDjnwxqcEEUMg937nPo0kJmr9ksFjj4FZnFYxbQWM9iNj/nxck3fEMVZ5grMKZ sI7CBVWwHGYJ7YEViLKqkGa4ygQxKGIEJAEyDSYfiwWrvJdX4/hhcMqrgFVvFR3afvOC BBR9r/9Ou/QC5TjPCUol6wyBPEpRLU5K6oVeDjnTgGu1mzSNhCXUjP97xSEdJzD2bvi8 QsXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Cvc9j/NPXYyvvUpQeAXG/jS6nIR29jzlpFOGC3Vhx581D56DE 5ef0ab0K+A6y/OOY/EK5o85TMX/gvyGB8T2AurVHgXZlkIs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy67Mxs6yedB+vBKhJxW04JbhhSnnq9ik+JazjMXe5g0ci5UMULR4P/Tvad+7wHly2EQG5VIosnJSyq5eORcK0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7457:: with SMTP id h23mr17659064qtr.528.1643701403047; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:43:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164318837039.21788.17451980682651967578@ietfa.amsl.com> <EEA435EC-AAAC-4899-8E94-2D54EDE5F72E@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <EEA435EC-AAAC-4899-8E94-2D54EDE5F72E@eggert.org>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:43:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAK044S9HQXvfvgM6mBuvOWJPHtCaa6xo6CoP2r8Vq61tKaY5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003ed7de05d6f00ef3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/XfcfoFB8LFzS82IoHKcdcipnNsY>
Subject: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 07:43:30 -0000

Hello,

After some discussions among chairs, we decided to run the 2nd WGLC on
draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis in consideration of the importance of the draft.
We'll be grateful if you could send your feedback to the ML. The WGLC runs
until *Feb 11*.

If interested, you can check in-depth past discussions in the following URL.
https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/

Thank you so much!
--
tcpm co-chairs


On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:50 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> this -06 version rolls in all the changes requested during (and after)
> WGLC ended.
>
> I'll leave it up to the chairs to decide if another WGLC is warranted or
> the document can progress as-is.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
>
> > On 2022-1-26, at 11:12, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG
> of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : CUBIC for Fast and Long-Distance Networks
> >        Authors         : Lisong Xu
> >                          Sangtae Ha
> >                          Injong Rhee
> >                          Vidhi Goel
> >                          Lars Eggert
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt
> >       Pages           : 35
> >       Date            : 2022-01-26
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   CUBIC is a standard TCP congestion control algorithm that uses a
> >   cubic function instead of a linear congestion window increase
> >   function to improve scalability and stability over fast and long-
> >   distance networks.  CUBIC has been adopted as the default TCP
> >   congestion control algorithm by the Linux, Windows, and Apple stacks.
> >
> >   This document updates the specification of CUBIC to include
> >   algorithmic improvements based on these implementations and recent
> >   academic work.  Based on the extensive deployment experience with
> >   CUBIC, it also moves the specification to the Standards Track,
> >   obsoleting RFC 8312.  This also requires updating RFC 5681, to allow
> >   for CUBIC's occasionally more aggressive sending behavior.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis/
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.html
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
> :internet-drafts
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>