Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at> Tue, 19 November 2019 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC5C12004D for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:07:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEZCQ_3V5fT4 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAF91200DB for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 04:07:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1574165262; bh=I4MsKFPsTr5uvE83O/VqUPtoQ6JJsH/Esd+ka3eFIaQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HE0gB8gGEPQ5BOYkXZ3fWQmZ1KDJa8Zh0mkzZk9WYatwqOfCzJ1VBBTkDZ1yu6O+9 d+RUdoB+XksiwUIjUBGI8ZL4aJ7lGwcOmOuWhEZTQ8jFK6UBdSMkzBJhESAfgIlIFx ilShgfxUlV+EK/tGEXWJ36/dBLwQBgwhKiGWR3l8=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [172.20.8.66] ([202.55.67.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9dsb-1hlHND1gM1-015Voh; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:07:42 +0100
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <HE1PR07MB44256AB7B0B3864F67CD538EC24C0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F9130FD0-C761-4225-9A13-2F68240D455A@gmail.com>
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
Message-ID: <51d48c8c-c668-8122-fd88-037a86cdbe38@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:07:36 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F9130FD0-C761-4225-9A13-2F68240D455A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:kimDg243nIPNvgpKQGKCVjvv7f96bYSdWZRM/1QyBIFN8VIgWII BTkoxwfeQfct/a7uvDegW6FYaZmSo52s3djWS11Eg22VjdEIjGjs+EflOD2E2MWxHv1WqfY S+OnrChWedLK4I7/u9Fh8mHimpqRkaCvtbqVvCP0Z1qZcq35fnbhEprNNe4YWSU/UXZ/DgM 3BeoiOkV6Pig5/Csyco/A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mP5DvPKnB9o=:sOujRmKz+zDfEbF/quQFGv AIxcI6mm7qTH6LdC+sXHphipS71xvG/GbrMLA9hhuqprnEHRAF7N/psaQkoHXOfZmlWqBxdKh dZFdTpzBhul3iz0fBIMArRNXs39kK1TNL3R6EpbVJMVQuEw0ozyR9SFJsvCVZLo6Cz3LUImW8 2vNNB3Ug/j0ol8Pa4YgEYrW/CA+NUh0DLNW6BWpRI293j8hBklzcFOnXPcW/yZxYLcvQI6EKC 6NoceE7127sOSPu9K5iiPpAcckmCAFmyeQiDs2RfKedKZBRjhpRUbg3unAIPy29uhDdbSUTI6 XdX6TjkdsD2twM3waMG06bwMA9ihf6VusC7bwALFwCDzQybmw1XdAB3q5oyOT77bEl5F2YqJL bBoVJ6KKYz/qectmsC8wwDOg6jMJh3MW10mQ6CO2TV9hiDjyQ1nDcTN6DDh9x77AfBwUxUPbX HtyhwhkkmyrSvRT4DOliGwc038+PzBhDG8PcSao1qqZQlW4bNLq7KCjU1K9yyFjS3bq9/czlc CfSnqlPWalSt1B7SWPF9ob+O91f7czSpar7uQbAQLhXEfJCw7tAQ6/EcuHzElbcODVErHkBKV UXnYy+5Rsftt655ItL5nw/H9/Bdn7z/5GVeRL3p3knK8Dk9faX1+xzpCGxBaUbr+rVQhZWQQb 6ht+NvGIaW9FI7A+tmYuLZ/aukYhIji5nhp84QbQHxBI4JEZxX2boVHGKvFcMk5oe3sb9m17G Kim+bQh2c9h14c97uEMHzIUvkB4lBjogeC/3YPN2t2bBvxqzWSntG/6U/oyEskMLY4nVjIRGY VvUWv7/Of5FNzLibh7BqZaznBtyvL32Zrt1JrCwDa7jSgO/R/D+rguRKTKjXLXBPFlE3kkKh/ rWfkj3WzmGW3D6B+IL5mDDRmByG6gbGE7osM/JaHOUeLirU8vIH4zTCt14BGj8/HTmTAmWfiD k+cgLyqWCS8YEN7kH3vucRnObK0nzRWkAYXB0SDUJuviAVLzXjL9sJ1f5pFIsgYsrytxabj4K Cl6/k87p2dwd21CaY8lCuXFsa4qa9Bn8HGobiORth4P3jsZWe9wi0CrWZmaqtWFrbOkJmzb5i 8GUHUUnwphZLJEXSV0ofHq3c57go9EfDaySyIuq/UtB7ESw4JWAKjZMTA7pGA6kCClrsRBws4 gbODJjHlRW+/nMxP2n0GCNvESLxjsyAqjgHcfkAwssMkpgOEoNrhv+4bg1jhWQM80AGxT1FnY +rv5Xv2jnpy2/Ejh0H5ssv2ndBwJ174wkzcnTdQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/XhDrDJTtZVmLNU2U-K7iPVjjgkw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:07:54 -0000

For FreeBSD, that alternate stack is in production (public internet) use
by at least one operator, and other operators are looking into making
RACK their default.

Also, on FBSD any improvements on the base (NewReno) stack need to be
reflected in RACK, e.g. when new functionality is implemented.

RACK is certainly a serious affair :)

Richard



Am 19.11.2019 um 12:06 schrieb Jonathan Morton:
> FreeBSD I understand has a RACK-capable TCP stack, but which is not the default.  I think Rod Grimes should be able to clarify this, and he's also on this list.