Re: [tcpm] Meeting Notes // TCP silent close issue

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 13 November 2021 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63963A112E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 967uZF2GX52u for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-5.web-hosting.com (server217-5.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141EE3A115A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:24:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dkmopchKnu2UUGgh0oLepo8QspxSbG9woFWLHP15/rg=; b=GM6pIW0bkbUr+3gS5O1BL+DRSc mov50V9Xb+mM62s33CagI2y7g1WHs+NtJrn3RonuXyUhaENLVlvUtrTRjbe0HSTcLk3de+yCyaGPx AyfEdnVBdH0z4MdKg2XFjjB5Su8KWQmt2lguD72a9ddAZr2I4GDpUS87rCrX+cRplrqHb3TpiY2rI o3o0hGtEoxp7zLrLCxuuPDdg+kmJQd8cfwn4tNEqfHaPIDgG/xLgUO0G4QhZLJno5UNsj3nOvqOm3 1LWyRv3SDCzJBrWQbbhc6xkeNSIgQQp7OkBk+2EwadVUNSRei6vjVfvGFV7SH6FActnBLhJ+r4xYt npny9wzQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:54253 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1mlwlJ-00DOO9-GX; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 12:24:26 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E67242ED-4C09-4C56-8803-65542AE048E8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <EFEFC910-0859-454E-B988-C41ED5C22B1D@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:24:20 -0800
Cc: Extensions <tcpm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <C9AF93C3-8A6C-4F9A-B6E7-3098B2727EBF@strayalpha.com>
References: <96A7D17B-D8EC-4724-8E2B-532FEDD3C4B8@fh-muenster.de> <C8B8411B-9332-4A0C-BDF6-C440EC391408@strayalpha.com> <EFEFC910-0859-454E-B988-C41ED5C22B1D@fh-muenster.de>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/XraMmhlxpVDu7KI8wpci-Lr-Eds>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Meeting Notes // TCP silent close issue
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 17:24:32 -0000

On the issue below:

> On Nov 12, 2021, at 10:37 AM, tuexen@fh-muenster.de wrote:
> 
>> (Incidentally, a question to the chair: aren’t topics with meeting times slots supposed to have at least been discussed on the list or drafted?)
> Just on this question:
> 
> If time permits, we accept presentations without IDs if we think that having a discussion
> in TCPM makes sense. In this particular case, the presentation was the last one and we used
> only the remaining meeting time.

Without IDs sure, but without a single mention on the list?

> In my experience a presentation in the meeting is triggering a discussion much easier than
> just a post to the mailing list.

It trades a limited resource (meeting time) for the presenter’s effort; that seems the wrong optimization to me.

FWIW, it didn’t take all that long for me to summarize the issue, the proposed approach, *and* a solution not presented to the list.

Joe