IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 18 August 2021 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2BA3A0D27; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sa0msxWq1-3Y; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB1A3A0D25; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id t68so2095138qkf.8; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=otJXQonvaJX9EQ++VxevVrAJPH0/rKvssrctZhc+L84=; b=PLQsXBxcNbZZXP1Nm41iBKv39ZmCClFZf1/9DC1ojJ5+QqOqH8VYoYLsLD+pR06+DF Wu9c20mGTLHoKsWnrwUd46MqSbnUCMLRJntm5e7wLKZOECClH1N3McKtEskI5R09e4iO F6hpdqyOcuAU0uYmiYI2AbGoZXx76ZEOfIsj2mm/AFF4a2p90hDItm8IBX+WcpltMbNK /aY0f7L2g1n4q2m5FJxubSz9xhzkeZIg0Z8jRCQq1dCuOIoW8vtL/CwVF6hdZFBpJbpH Jnm2X8tZ7m7BVegj55guNjVRVbO02T/kx5apgNOzzMl60aIMMe2D0zxX0L3isVEiWCfL FAXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=otJXQonvaJX9EQ++VxevVrAJPH0/rKvssrctZhc+L84=; b=fhmgVqk7vDshUUwLfgMCEsj+nTYr+PpnXMFENRAGzRM1bxYXNDQFpQnQ3HlnhdAufg nYAkvNygkQyY74oLC074mQJ6DZ0RyyCQ/lob06dhwO2AT3R6gdoW13Mq/Sa16lZYjH9f keJ1SX+jzrBH4vFp47LiKEf+H9DjsUICFSp5hrIN7DyPoyK97jOn3GJthPjtXtee09bO FrbIUKdKtmvVC2nwpS6iUJbwvLgJVOsQAPtOQAdaucLduPrUM1ezAYHaABPMLFIXtLAq sOnshNxYHbEL8kzXf+9NM57h4ma07CFd6OeNN0Mw9KwsJTlcerGepHNHNzA4Cv5m0X+l pjCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pp3yatHYKGE2lfpN6RcMzZ5kf1kfyiNY9hWVB0/T+HxY3i1Ej HMKhpRpZRzFAPNA/K4UynCPDlHsZiCyxN+lyhd5IOxDX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2nSTJZk5hR+64bwSLdZ6UjHbTd3OkclRHeXh+QEL0vGqov80mZxzbR66HIAUHvSrIdmPLC1vsksVqNtoO2k0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:17a9:: with SMTP id ay41mr8266152qkb.454.1629275572085; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:32:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044SjMmBnO8xdn2ogWMZTcecXoET1dmZqd6Dt3WzOUi359A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b7278c05c9d147d5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/YGoa0Vk7N8qISoGPLqMugnvSeJQ>
Subject: [tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:32:57 -0000

Hi,
The chairs think 8312bis draft is in good shape and it's ready for
submission.
We know we had some discussions on how to handle ABC draft in the draft
during the last WG meeting and there are on-going related discussions on
the ML.
However, we still think we can proceed with the draft as the
relevance between the draft and the current discussions is not very high.

If anyone has different thoughts on this, please let us know.
Otherwise, we will prepare a writeup soon and submit it to IESG.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email