[tcpm] Feedback request on draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security (more time to comment!)
Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Fri, 12 March 2010 19:04 UTC
Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF08C3A68C5 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:04:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.607
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcBFY7xWnSAT for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24813A68B4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D116B6A86; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:04:39 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.2.184] (182.76.92-79.rev.gaoland.net [79.92.76.182] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2CJ4TYk009649; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:04:33 -0300
Message-ID: <4B99CA9C.9070807@gont.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:01:16 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:04:39 -0300 (ART)
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [tcpm] Feedback request on draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security (more time to comment!)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:04:33 -0000
Folks, Some of you had expressed interest in providing feedback on the aforementioned I-D. However, so far only a one person (Wes) has sent feedback. Given that more comments are needed, and that the last few weeks have probably been particularly busy (IETF I-D submission cut-off's), we have extended the period of time to send comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt). I'm requesting feedback on all the sections through Section 3.1.2.3. -- this includes the introduction sections, the basic check on the TCP segment size (Section 3) and the discussion of port numbers (Section 3.1 with all its subsections). Please review these sections and submit comments by Monday March 22nd, 2010, so that we can move on to the next sections in a timely manner. Thanks! -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
- [tcpm] Feedback request on draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-se… Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] Feedback request on draft-ietf-tcpm-tc… Smith, Donald