[tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Tue, 06 July 2021 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E053A33C7; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 13:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FO2QtSdpmtgu; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 13:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF5C3A33C3; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 13:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain []) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D494B25A1A; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 22:04:53 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1625601893; bh=P2Sv76ioNJvPguS+Jswo3IN/LskUmvf0TRl+e4kXxiI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=KuIB8dVMbNMxTHKog8wtbnPY6m93JHfAwGbRRI7/ts0tRZvDBdAHzlXKDghyeep3b ZZAfC9R1S6K/P05XCHCq+Eum5nbwdiOKeGtSRTubpZWnKDickVu/gHGjGmyXwVot/j eo8TcPed1DXzaVYsnFRr20a58eBICEQsu/svDkHE=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NryEymiqaLy; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 22:04:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8201.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8201.hs-esslingen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 22:04:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ( by rznt8201.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 22:04:52 +0200
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0]) by rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0%3]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.014; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 22:04:52 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
CC: "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?
Thread-Index: AddyoYAExwdNYisyQIax/m998gxedQ==
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 20:04:52 +0000
Message-ID: <8de93237209d4fc7ab062bbc24217999@hs-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/YWU0B-lXipdizQwQq7Tt-BFzWZU>
Subject: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 20:05:03 -0000

Hi all,

Joe has submitted draft-touch-sne to the ISE asking for publication of an RFC on the Independent Stream. (Background: An RFC on Independent Stream is not an IETF standard.)

Publication on independent stream would be possible provided that the document does not conflict with TCPM or other IETF work. An obvious alternative would be homing the document in TCPM (or TSVWG) as an official WG item - but this is not what is currently proposed.

A link to the document is:


Note that the current header field "TCPM" would have to be replaced in the further publication process, as documents on the independent stream are not the outcome of an IETF WG.

The TCPM chairs have reviewed draft-touch-sne. Our current understanding that there would be no harm caused by such an independent stream publication. As far as RFC 5925 is affected, we assume that an Errata would be possible and sufficient.

Before we get back to the ISE regarding this document, we would like to cross-check whether our understanding is indeed the TCPM consensus:

Are there any concerns inside the TCPM community regarding a publication of draft-touch-sne draft-touch-sne on independent stream? If so, please speak up!


on behalf of all chairs