Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07
"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 04 July 2022 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539C4C157903; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qw2OfKFu5U9X; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F66C14F735; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4VoeGURyNQPaFlVap255qYCqV+qetq1/47PfRvdx8Uc=; b=PlAn3w/BtyM65qofZtNg2ytHl/ 3Ztz7koLhrBgGrprXqWPNfhzVhDkQWVqJF0znYed/Iojqyv6QOqQAwtG5mGMGQsPtR22yQaj6lelt xS4Lqy/7lWGYOYxoIDri4Rl3DtMY1GsKmawKC+IMbIKWWYH2+4NRuTjLKF3WpKIk1kt9XJfY46Y57 cAUsKjoBynNtTJpGBbdAQcy/Kzyiq1ky0lOtjvmpZkXWKgf0UvprdCFNXC1stzBtEaqdoIiXsmgHM v0FIK3UIWNPgGVURk3kK/ilLLSvM1MX6Wlujck0LxZycxuTmVqrMdYw0k1cOcfF84sSdo0Xbz41k0 6zVmfNOg==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:58093 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1o8Rlf-002Zod-0r; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 15:30:03 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGxUxqFko1R5yVkpc6Ujw6SJcOjB209YNKuGJo+MOZfvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:29:57 -0700
Cc: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp.all@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B130CC17-B93A-4D3F-90B1-01E29BDD6975@strayalpha.com>
References: <165690747653.9313.6940379164951428048@ietfa.amsl.com> <DF6CF2BD-8418-4386-BB78-6E011A523FBA@strayalpha.com> <CABNhwV1SN+Ei_TScwUsg1scKhAAoxixfFTtXXghLXEPspU6gZA@mail.gmail.com> <893612ED-91B7-4492-8000-EF2D54AC49BC@strayalpha.com> <4688b79370e94df6b8af107a97be0a7f@hs-esslingen.de> <CAOj+MMGxUxqFko1R5yVkpc6Ujw6SJcOjB209YNKuGJo+MOZfvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/YnnrJBuKvkDqb8xcVEWbn-mzmgc>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 19:30:08 -0000
> On Jul 4, 2022, at 12:15 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Any application can decide to configure TCP parameters as far as possible in the given operation > > system, e.g., via the sockets API. That is orthogonal to the internals of the TCP implementation and the TCP protocol. > > While clients running on top of TCP can configure its parameters I would at least expect to be able to report such values (local and remote) when using the TCP YANG model. For example I can not find the Urgent Flag in the current YANG model. That’s because URG is not a property of the TCP connection; it’s a property of a segment, not the connection. The same is true for PSH. > Same for elementary window size of any given connection, same for connection duration, . There is no such thing as “elementary window size”. There are a variety of window parameters, i.e., send window, congestion window, receive window. Only the send and receive windows are application / OS set. If there’s a list of desired parameters, it would be useful to start by stating them in terms of the TCP specs and explaining why they need to be remotely managed. Joe
- [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-… Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- Re: [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] [OPS-DIR] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat … Susan Hares
- Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] [OPS-DIR] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] [OPS-DIR] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat … tuexen
- Re: [tcpm] [OPS-DIR] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [tcpm] [OPS-DIR] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat … Gyan Mishra