Re: [tcpm] New I-D

Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov> Tue, 13 February 2007 18:59 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HH2ro-0007WO-DR; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:59:04 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HH2rn-0007Tw-7R for tcpm@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:59:03 -0500
Received: from mx1.grc.nasa.gov ([128.156.11.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HH2rl-0003P3-Rs for tcpm@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:59:03 -0500
Received: from lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (seraph.grc.nasa.gov [128.156.10.10]) by mx1.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F38EC299 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:58:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.35]) by lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l1DIwrwE001455; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:58:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l1DIwrOw009929; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:58:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apataki.grc.nasa.gov ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (apataki.grc.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id hH77a-Fh9uiQ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:58:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from drpepper.grc.nasa.gov (gr2134391.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.44.123])by apataki.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l1DIwmJv009878;Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by drpepper.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix, from userid 501)id 8C0F64FE1C; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:55:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:55:52 -0500
From: Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mahesh@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] New I-D
Message-ID: <20070213185552.GB7252@grc.nasa.gov>
References: <45D20253.70706@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45D20253.70706@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-imss-version: 2.046
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:2 M:2 S:2 R:2 (0.0000 0.0000)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: weddy@grc.nasa.gov
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:24:19AM -0800, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> A new I-D has been posted on the IETF web site.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mahesh-persist-timeout-00.txt
> "TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions", Mahesh Jethanandani, Murali 
> Bashyam, 9-Feb-07, <draft-mahesh-persist-timeout-00.txt> 
> Comments are welcome.

It's good to see the description of the problem you observed along with
the solution, but it looks to me like this is more of an OS mechanism to
manage resources rather than a protocol-based mechanism.  Is this
correct?

-- 
Wesley M. Eddy
Verizon Federal Network Systems

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm