IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] WG status update

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Wed, 10 November 2010 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25B23A696C for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:55:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1rr37p7hUMu for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5EB3A6919 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndjsppt02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.101]) by ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6060A80CF for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:55:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ndjshub03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub03-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.33]) by ndjsppt02.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAA0ttPN018904 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:55:55 -0600
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub03.ndc.nasa.gov ([10.202.202.162]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:55:55 -0600
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:54:50 -0600
Thread-Topic: WG status update
Thread-Index: AQHLgHIHUw43nIWZ1Ei4oXaJ2dgBYA==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4821F155C3@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4821F155C3NDJSSCC01ndcn_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15, 1.0.148, 0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-09_15:2010-11-09, 2010-11-09, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] WG status update
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:55:31 -0000

Hi, for those of you who aren't in Beijing, here's a snapshot of the TCPM WG status.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email