Re: [tcpm] rfc8312bis: use of the term 'AIMD'
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Wed, 15 September 2021 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ncardwell@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58C43A1BE3 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86JIEOpy_mVF for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DFC3A1BE0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id 2so2585251qtw.1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1Bf1fVWNeIR/Dv051dBG5B3GQDm0HUnC57O7yWT5nXA=; b=piP3u84wGn3ls3/KX5ZJYWFVVX0Aht+b+91O3dK3fkADKEcECgjnVlUy66oXWAE/5t yJe4KkgMkhioq/d0r0X+XN76sn0feJBx+kQXTjkHrAHCLY20M1MID1o6QZaG50cOAI6l U3Ag2b4VdOMp+hEVcnTHVAuq0r9tM3Sdukr1Ka7UM1mzLNSQj0Nj1TY9MtuMaNA1T63J auYuNWm74vmTwi/oxm046KtMsAF+3XPz53IsdJJcLt4HXK/uyGm4vbPJMYmwD0dC1PgR 9/AlLosTLdUxT5ft+brI155VWzz9pkfp/oyxFWhOEepMBG3LfmR/yyYgjqfK1d7d1qzw O8ZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1Bf1fVWNeIR/Dv051dBG5B3GQDm0HUnC57O7yWT5nXA=; b=Iv0koBcVd0i7WRQ5Q8E4w5yAdPEtwPp/fbAsJ+xVX33veIR2M4d8dI1806akLtu/Oi uPTgTXnrc1JmyhDBRGYnmo3OHoqWB8sCGyYSJabBphsj4krH9Ubba5YdM+vQUy5CIrnX wMU8za9y/T0WmkC/gugb6c44+J7MhTtMkpo769XGOhIed5sOwvqc5jJcdgzRzHhmpRkY rLrFa3ryFJmxuOKPvEJJAmZJ7yPyatGoqwULjyvAI5xI+p8ROIJT8odJsY2Lt9T6D5kj Q5+1OOhNoMJoc8pU3pLfShU1r2YpHZfjv8a/X1X1UyNsXbC0j5xXB7O+jx5gl0QSp+/e RkVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325cHlbhMnQhd1miqp3MJaGWqWEd4EirGdN5bYYgPguI1peaPNK LAuNQVw5rtXmv1H8T4yaRGBvVouMNwPRtSnJG3sS/w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoTH8ZaaMn91qnBM7XRVTUSusEYnTcDgq6eVDmi6+j7ugWs+JktBfm/JTSBvVY5XH3kz0NlAHFMvxyzmxxqDo=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:74b:: with SMTP id k11mr279728qth.46.1631717854436; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <854defe0-a49b-d6ad-c242-934e5bf913b8@bobbriscoe.net>
In-Reply-To: <854defe0-a49b-d6ad-c242-934e5bf913b8@bobbriscoe.net>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:57:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CADVnQy==o07r8hA+n9LvbgGzvUHunX2LDn8RGfmgGbNWVC0D4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Cc: "EGGERT, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@apple.com>, Lisong Xu <xu@unl.edu>, "draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis@ietf.org>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/ZI70kwAoIO9fnOHeWj2xLoZJKkE>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] rfc8312bis: use of the term 'AIMD'
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:57:41 -0000
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:18 AM Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote: > > Lars, Lisong, Vidhi and co-authors, > > Sorry. in the process of trying to close off the recent github issues, I noticed one editorial point that is prevalent throughout the document: > I think the terms 'AIMD TCP' and AIMD-friendly are inappropriate and would be better replaced with just 'Reno' and 'Reno-friendly', for these reasons: I very much agree with Bob's remarks; I'd like to put in a second vote for replacing 'AIMD TCP' and 'AIMD-friendly' with 'Reno' and 'Reno-friendly'. The latter terms are more precise (implying specific constants for the AIMD mechanism), and nicely agnostic to transport protocol. best regards, neal
- [tcpm] rfc8312bis: use of the term 'AIMD' Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] rfc8312bis: use of the term 'AIMD' Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] rfc8312bis: use of the term 'AIMD' tom petch
- Re: [tcpm] rfc8312bis: use of the term 'AIMD' Eggert, Lars