Re: [tcpm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7323 (6798)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Wed, 09 February 2022 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF423A0122 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6O9GyJorOCKS for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336F43A0A10 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14097425A344; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sp2tQkMbcWzQ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B566D424B435; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211226085938.97471F0F1F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:19:22 -0800
Cc: yaakovjstein@gmail.com, david.borman@quantum.com, braden@isi.edu, vanj@google.com, rs@netapp.com, tcpm@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC30262C-B376-44B8-9993-E9D492187103@amsl.com>
References: <20211226085938.97471F0F1F@rfc-editor.org>
To: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/_PqiSr1RcdSmSs7XV7t4m4qEJRA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7323 (6798)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:19:28 -0000

Greetings,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6798

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs

> On Dec 26, 2021, at 12:59 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7323,
> "TCP Extensions for High Performance".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6798
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Yaakov Stein <yaakovjstein@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The Timestamps option may appear in any data or <ACK> segment, adding
> 
> The timestamp clock may be derived from a system clock that is
> 
> A random offset may be added to the timestamp clock on a per-
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The Timestamps option MAY appear in any data or <ACK> segment, adding
> 
> The timestamp clock MAY be derived from a system clock that is
> 
> A random offset MAY be added to the timestamp clock on a per-
> 
> Notes
> -----
> several "MAY"s were incorrectly written as non RFC 2119 "may"s
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7323 (draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-21)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : TCP Extensions for High Performance
> Publication Date    : September 2014
> Author(s)           : D. Borman, B. Braden, V. Jacobson, R. Scheffenegger, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>