Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

"Rodney W. Grimes" <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Sun, 17 November 2019 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64F6120128 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:27:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xGl4eCyhlCuW for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:27:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEFF612001E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:27:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id xAHJRo0I062724; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:27:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from 4bone@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id xAHJRnlW062723; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:27:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 4bone)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <201911171927.xAHJRnlW062723@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQynqK_5i9nXJ2tsZrsp1r2n5q=PsFqjoVdHBS-+Ecg1Caw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:27:49 -0800 (PST)
CC: Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/_ZZo2eL58OBE_gCZISp4zC3ieW8>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:27:54 -0000

I am finding myself in agreement with others, PS is the correct status.

Thank you Neal for the good siting of RFC7127 with respect to PS,

Regards,
Rod

> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:49 AM Praveen Balasubramanian
> <pravb=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > RACK is fundamental enough, subsumes TLP, and has enough implementation and deployment. My vote is for PS status.
> 
> Personally, I agree with Praveen, that "Proposed Standard" is
> appropriate, given my understanding of the definition from
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7127#section-3.1 :
> 
>    3.1.  Characterization of IETF Proposed Standard Specifications
>    ...
>    A Proposed Standard specification is stable, has resolved known
>    design choices, has received significant community review, and
>    appears to enjoy enough community interest to be considered valuable.
> 
>    Usually, neither implementation nor operational experience is
>    required for the designation of a specification as a Proposed
>    Standard.  However, such experience is highly desirable and will
>    usually represent a strong argument in favor of a Proposed Standard
>    designation.
> 
> There are several independent and very widely deployed implementations
> of RACK at this point.
> 
> best regards,
> neal
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org