[tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wave mechanism can be simplified to three-wave mechanism
Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 25 August 2024 07:06 UTC
Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2B1C14CE2C for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZK_3ZOoPcsv for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1784AC14CEFC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7a66b813847so205146785a.2 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724569570; x=1725174370; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SIo6zImfVT0JU/lSG+O2zUPoQZuxeV/urSmCcXnuCKg=; b=MdpwKAOVFwXSbeumFXGXK3N8fm4pggjQC1wT3rGQo6sxo0GzF/61ioYBvcwJ5hsJoV I8d9xJo2gvD5fNPeLQipjX1VEoQQq25CtfV9zkk5lg7xVkSgdpTSPo2TeOLh+fnzdo8M T64yZduQstKk37zIjY/DqpD1mC0y+Ai11hEbQaeF+ARXYKtZPaVvjl/DMQgMIBy7vBOw EOu/8lPzwMEJbHEpVEyZEIJqOr11By4pcaeaEexzIg06UXRO0OrcpJs91TeSIOdUqSB5 ndHeqcjZo6lJ0gscvSvDkUzJFxWBWvfuJdwt1++6RKyaCB8GxH9CsgEachuWEcjDQYDe TGog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724569570; x=1725174370; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SIo6zImfVT0JU/lSG+O2zUPoQZuxeV/urSmCcXnuCKg=; b=QIm+3zud24IgeyM/5LGvNxx9ZrTVtM18v8aqmpft4I9uLeEVR3oyMfCRoDvNV4D+gK LDQCxRZzfpD7pQUNN0/zxPtNRvAr1OmQ7eTCwPMWwPRoEOMwY1dKuX6MWVKwSfaY/oEV t/ELPAbEE8g7qJqgW8+iBYNDpw+xPfvxmDOlmhv7es/FleNcoHqtwYbs2Tlbi9Yva8Ys I3LStG2jQqbyjyWSXB/qbnf6JYqjnjBcJif8/XHGeDfLL2XUUFeCOJGaSshk3Ixztoou RixwlpiedzcJad2vVbwDg5GxSgprYnKgE2h9QL/JIVocQ2nZ4f+Jxbj6UbQ1CayWVaWd Cy8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyTNh8EpVumaQvhc83Mn8jWwse5wFB11YZ/bCxTesRFgJDvOf82 x5T4vAAaAPApZ9ZB9vzFAqaVawALibUDrTzoKdWA97Wq/D2Hj7cAmILXPpjgCOw1yATBV36+9CX je4kpu6jrtfIRAhrSQBr68jAmAMw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEWKXhupe0KyYfZmtFEBYXWmr6N853+stHnT9W47oN9kb9ogfNkSHmiWD2KObAl8gH1dPecthMrpFbdFy79gW8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:470e:b0:79d:79cb:2a5f with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7a6897a772dmr726249485a.63.1724569570062; Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6defaffd.3f8b1.1917c9c2f23.Coremail.yangbuwangchuxin@163.com>
In-Reply-To: <6defaffd.3f8b1.1917c9c2f23.Coremail.yangbuwangchuxin@163.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 00:05:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044SZyk5LJwohkJ-Fjk1rZidq5fGKXHYBBxgUWh45aiijXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "yangbuwangchuxin@163.com" <yangbuwangchuxin@163.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d390d06207ca46b"
Message-ID-Hash: YB7M4CNAYHMRHTOIPDGDOQ3NGPTDCYWR
X-Message-ID-Hash: YB7M4CNAYHMRHTOIPDGDOQ3NGPTDCYWR
X-MailFrom: nsd.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tcpm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wave mechanism can be simplified to three-wave mechanism
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/_eAUFD3mKNdoN-9ImmhDvgamNFg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tcpm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tcpm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tcpm-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Yang, Are you referring to the 4 way close in TCP? and you want to make it 3 way? -- Yoshi On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 5:03 AM yangbuwangchuxin@163.com < yangbuwangchuxin@163.com> wrote: > IEFT Hello, I am a Chinese computer major student, I have an idea is to > study the TCP four wave mechanism, if one party still has data to pass, > continue to open the connection. However, if both parties have no more data > to transmit at a given moment, can it be possible to dispense with one > wave, thus turning four waves into three? (Go straight back to the finally > state at the end of the third time.) For example, is it feasible to go > directly to the last step, that is, to change from the original four waves > to three waves? Is there a theoretical basis for this assumption and the > possibility of practical application? > > Thank you, looking forward to reply! > > I wish all the best! > Yang Zhiyuan > August 23, 2024 > > > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list -- tcpm@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tcpm-leave@ietf.org >
- [tcpm] Discussion on whether the TCP four-wave me… yangbuwangchuxin@163.com
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… yangbuwangchuxin@163.com
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… yangbuwangchuxin@163.com
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… yangbuwangchuxin@163.com
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… Michael Tuexen
- [tcpm] Re: Discussion on whether the TCP four-wav… yangbuwangchuxin@163.com