Re: [tcpm] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00.txt

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 February 2021 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60343A046B for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:28:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8IcqkF0ZYF6 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6133A00C4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id a1so546739qvd.13 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:28:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EiMhINt/KA8fldi3TuKjGeztzD1Z9gT0dduQ7KE4bfc=; b=s/p2Ck7m7dS+GcGN9thwTrVtM5pQV48dNvDg37sc9Mr09gbOZfkWj1JW2rdInZ5rUA WFDCiMh++AHkCQkJYisNxMkVlWAzdNB16WjJY/4MxTu/bC65QAj+yamKjnEzkXVpnCok JpBTA0HNLcICKIOEXygaW5xb99Gb1deWVCs9ylUYNTxiiPl8A7YpfD/g1rncK2e1E+HI u8b/pKuB8zgrIBBYb1apfQkKgTBn4EU7y3GJySRlF94bP20UMmG2U21D8w/Gcj2RhrYz yO2TZn16iSAJrbSxO9uGkXuCetEtxwoqnb4WxyytJ9S3viaw5sC6jF8v81iBmJd6w7oV 44+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EiMhINt/KA8fldi3TuKjGeztzD1Z9gT0dduQ7KE4bfc=; b=H98vqfxuoO0mtpp5I/cCC2VYD7UciQaVI1VOc/Efl2R4oC0saf5sF8A3GUARd4DIK+ U8c1aJtEenyR58VgoClbmsI11oTIWiMtnOSsor2sou07e9rgKeHSIhavD3ymIqISff2m dOWDNZk6m7/NRdHsFvkzLwc2VJUQmyHs+JVG9FT9UDgnzH7AiPFqPiIFpggsz2YP8+EA DVsaYuTZdZ2nXil0wIlyEFYGF8+Ca17V4yrOUbbhZHLo93GzJJGwHC0eM1y1J6X+XyNW f0evnm16dO0/jHGIRvxhy0VYdoGpqr8l9c4P3MV8E8TTSt6Eid9VZQRZpDbmn7YnVbhT LaBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yxpcothRL4PWBP2n6VxIfUil9w5uPrXih3Mw/UNbndjmNxfL/ wEJx2a67co4itEDucGY/HqTSc+o8MqAh9Y5P0Fg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRsZevObAOW3w4eMnt0d6Cx8aWDsNhLHK/U1hHara5iBR+XBr+M+Wd+2pG/DdQXnycuSI3Y9cmwRxEC9eA7Q8=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:40c6:: with SMTP id x6mr2113601qvp.10.1612952923387; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:28:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161233469809.31214.294457730576935197@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAK044QYBiGXKm+D+=edc8TWhjzAadBxER5VRFmJOdW8hdXFKg@mail.gmail.com> <719A2C1D4AC73847B6E1BF21DF1545EAE5E77372@dggemm514-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <719A2C1D4AC73847B6E1BF21DF1545EAE5E77372@dggemm514-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:28:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAK044SNwkYBkdB1Ji=Yt-onVnRnnsn6GLA37691zXnk3WpqLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kangjiao <kangjiao@huawei.com>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Liangqiandeng <liangqiandeng@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009bb2f05baf8de6f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/a8QtHtcMpJ4ulCbx4_XvCsXHJk4>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:28:47 -0000

Hi Kangjiao,

OK. I think it has some similarities. I will think about this further and
will get back to you.
--
Yoshi

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:14 PM Kangjiao <kangjiao@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Yoshi,
>
>
>
> I wrote a draft to propose an idea for MPTCP subtype capability exchange
> during MPTCP handshake.  We think, in MPTCP, some options are mandatory but
> some options can be set as optional ones. So an exchange mechanism of
> actual capability between both parties are needed.
>
>
>
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kang-tcpm-subtype-capability-exchange-00.txt
>
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kang-tcpm-subtype-capability-exchange/
>
> Html:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kang-tcpm-subtype-capability-exchange-00.html
>
> Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kang-tcpm-subtype-capability-exchange-00
>
>
>
> When I read your draft, I think maybe our above work have some relevance
> to your suggestions. If you think it'll help with this work, I hope we can
> discuss this new negotiation mechanism for related options and subtypes.
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jiao
>
>
>
> *From:* tcpm [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Yoshifumi
> Nishida
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 3, 2021 3:12 PM
> *To:* tcpm@ietf.org Extensions <tcpm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [tcpm] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00.txt
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I prepared a draft for SYN option space extensions.
>
> I know this is a difficult issue in TCP and has been discussed for a long
> time.
>
> But, I'm thinking that it might be a good time to discuss it again.
>
>
>
> Key ideas of the draft are the followings.
>
> 1: drastic changes in TCP's spec will not be required
>
>     (it does not require updating TCP header format nor using multiple SYN
> packets or additional SYN-like packets)
>
> 2: utilize the option negotiation schemes in mptcp for generic purposes.
> so, I think it can be considered middlebox friendly.
>
> 3: it has some limitations (e.g it can only extend around 30-40 bytes for
> SYN option space). But, if it's combined with EDO, we can use more option
> space.
>
>     (depends on how EDO draft will progress, though)
>
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or comments or suggestions.
>
>
>
> Thank you so much!
>
> --
>
> Yoshi
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:45 PM
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00.txt
> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
>
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>
>         Title           : Aggregated Option for SYN Option Space Extension
>         Author          : Yoshifumi Nishida
>         Filename        : draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00.txt
>         Pages           : 14
>         Date            : 2021-02-02
>
> Abstract:
>    TCP option space is scarce resource as its max length is limited to
>    40 bytes.  This limitation becomes more significant in SYN segments
>    as all options used in a connection should be exchanged during SYN
>    negotiations.  This document proposes a new SYN option negotiation
>    scheme that provide a feature to compress TCP options in SYN segments
>    and provide more option space.  The proposed scheme does not update
>    the format of TCP header nor transmit any additional SYN or SYN-like
>    segments so that it has lower risks for middlebox interventions.  In
>    addition, by combining another proposal for option space extension,
>    it is possible to provide further option space.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>