IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] FW: Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Wed, 18 March 2020 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10FA3A1B38; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LXYzrikPIcSz; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6413A1B2F; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4FB25A17; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:11:21 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1584562281; bh=iaHhiUCd95E9RwjSyOWAk8M70Hal/2xnUGF0sHWNjRQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=hBRrJeNhAhR2lIkY7Y1gpd4U0Oe8kla0d5sJCCO1fLmMviK6PI+3amQgf8+c5vGfF spSChLL6xfeRMKq3IZ1hn3/VJ9C70Zyl+j4DqaUAv6tQpYQsiR/ifFoskheEkdNNWX eOjx/2pN65a6+gyA95P587Qcdki7/1KHHVgszmA0=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UA9d-r92ZzRj; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:11:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.29.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:11:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([169.254.3.209]) by rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::bd73:d6a9:24d7:95f1%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:11:20 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
CC: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
Thread-Index: AdX9YWO6m8xvduWhO0ywtFiDNCmPqg==
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:11:20 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D9F118B@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D9F118Brznt8114rzntrzd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/acjtV9OkSTBc1e9cXCZtH6pbBEM>
Subject: [tcpm] FW: Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:11:26 -0000

Hi all,

This is a heads-up regarding an ongoing adoption call for draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04 in TCPM.

This document imports groupings from draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server, and in general both documents should be aligned. The objective of a TCPM document is a more comprehensive model that e.g. also includes security (such as TCP-AO), stats, etc.

Obviously, the objective is not to have overlap between the two drafts. One question would benefit from more community feedback: The keep-alive objects in draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-04 could perhaps be moved to a TCPM document, if there was interest in that. Yet, such a change would result in a document dependency with the corresponding side-effects. From the point of view of the authors, changing the keep-alive groupings is not strictly needed, i.e., by default draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server would not be affected by the document in TCPM.

If you support work on this document in TCPM, or if you have any comments, please free to provide feedback on the TCPM list (tcpm@ietf.org).

Thanks

Michael (TCPM chair hat off)


Von: Michael Tuexen<mailto:tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. März 2020 21:44
An: tcpm IETF list<mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org<mailto:draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org>
Betreff: Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04

Dear all,

this mail starts a WG adoption call for
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04

So I would like to solicit feedback regarding support for or objections against the
adoption of the document as a WG document in TCPM.

Please provide feedback before March 31st.

For the context and current state of the document, see the presentation sent yesterday
to the mailing list by Mahesh.

Best regards
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email