Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Fri, 21 June 2019 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF2E120155 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMAxg_WsezIy for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B98A3120365 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id a15so8110437qtn.7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ry2rpOujHMLmvHtBeZT7YE9WP5EgMAaimo9N7tE/wJ4=; b=YBEcvAOAPG80bZNUW55Bs4eMQWWvhXWTSBoFwEhampbFR98BDcDDbm12Ykb2yD1rrG Hn1kLg7stKGyvFQLKmiYvDaeYRK0Y22wfGgaUkRTbIjxFn7VKOUk28ZkYCTEF6TikRC7 xibDB7HC3BYuaQLnsliYKUCvwhjQG1Pmy73YbAchKG/PWO2kmXdWRqNXDbUEkxdq+seV ZgdpoFqX1D4OrEK3qWb25Y92frKSki5bpTj1E+oApQ10r64vUSYW2NM+3u4DmR6NyWS5 TLQwqnW9J2Z1qot3MoFpOZm82YV+1Jty6UYilFFKZJLboNngON0u4eMMq4FoHiXyL5pk Pu+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ry2rpOujHMLmvHtBeZT7YE9WP5EgMAaimo9N7tE/wJ4=; b=EGHlACaj8kzoUmBNpKmcZK6QwcujjuznF6VHLW4r+Veexsjgi1usZk9mgh5RFHRxTm PoUpBUhA5hQVNJl2KbL9Rb+CT73WTuuGE9ySJvAr9SEzQSmWQ4Qgi2zeOtP9OvIKFW3F 2LLeYW01hW9li30Mgb1poZH+pVrfGYi/jPDJXsJxTmMAXMWdw7OZoqB9R5cGgp1UdjF3 lNzfmsRzaLxMD37cS+MJSz2Zif0EH6owkfizpAuh8XL906fP7iSr7GxKd7xqm2pHPhYv q8F6jCbCc8Xy7w6mbInOR9k5j0KtV6yhrsWN4bCPQP8stpDfgFxFog1Bq9XmTt0z3BL5 7CYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVa78zF7zYDlTwCRPzqrSe0FhfjQO+Tz1ey59bysS25fmZlnrQU 9wYfqnqOQ+j801Y/mW3xz+jk3A1k2Jg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwx58xZGpA/hfYkyXZnXM0T94MI0q+aW3xCR+vxczFm/PDp+s7/Y4N1SC87llpuUkEx9TTfUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d09c:: with SMTP id z28mr46102808qvg.149.1561146017711; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.119] (rrcs-69-135-1-122.central.biz.rr.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm2063453qkd.24.2019.06.21.12.40.16 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <155961153844.24918.3595391320504211546@ietfa.amsl.com> <DC9EC744-EA00-4A2E-A43C-6E7E2C5DDF99@icloud.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <309fa0fa-b43a-509d-2adb-f3154579702f@mti-systems.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:40:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DC9EC744-EA00-4A2E-A43C-6E7E2C5DDF99@icloud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0C4A0F80AE2FCA1772A70836"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/agXVJ-6HnXo04cl2z9py4dZcRnA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:40:27 -0000

Thanks Greg, I've made all 3 changes suggested below in my working copy.


On 6/14/2019 12:37 AM, Greg Skinner wrote:
> I found a few items while referring to this draft.  I hope the 
> feedback will be useful.
>
> §3.4:
>
> In the sentence "The principle reason for the three-way handshake is 
> to prevent old duplicate connection initiations from causing 
> confusion.” I believe the correct spelling should be “principal”, 
> because it is being used as an adjective.  (More information is 
> available from the definition of principal at wordreference.com 
> <https://www.wordreference.com/definition/principal>;.)
>
> §3.8.6:
>
> The phrase “robustness principle” is used, but not cited.  While most 
> readers of the draft probably know what it is, others may not.  IMO, a 
> citation would be helpful, either from references already in the draft 
> (RFCs 791, 793), or others such as RFC 1958, §3.
> §7:
>
> s/alphebetically/alphabetically/
>
> BR, Greg
>
>> On Jun 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org 
>> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions 
>> WG of the IETF.
>>
>>        Title           : Transmission Control Protocol Specification
>>        Author          : Wesley M. Eddy
>> Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.txt
>> Pages           : 104
>> Date            : 2019-06-03
>>
>> Abstract:
>>   This document specifies the Internet's Transmission Control Protocol
>>   (TCP).  TCP is an important transport layer protocol in the Internet
>>   stack, and has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of
>>   the Internet.  Over this time, a number of changes have been made to
>>   TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been
>>   documented in a piecemeal fashion.  This document collects and brings
>>   those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793.
>>   This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as 879, 2873, 6093, 6429,
>>   6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793.  It updates RFC 1122,
>>   and should be considered as a replacement for the portions of that
>>   document dealing with TCP requirements.  It updates RFC 5961 due to a
>>   small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED
>>   state.
>>
>>   RFC EDITOR NOTE: If approved for publication as an RFC, this should
>>   be marked additionally as "STD: 7" and replace RFC 793 in that role.
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm