Re: [tcpm] WGLC for UTO

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Mon, 05 November 2007 15:32 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ip3wM-00069w-AB; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:32:38 -0500
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ip3wK-000658-St for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:32:36 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ip3wK-00064A-II for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:32:36 -0500
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ip3wJ-0001IJ-8X for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:32:36 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.46] (pool-71-106-89-188.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.89.188]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA5FUH7V018378; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 07:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <472F36FC.1030301@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:30:04 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC for UTO
References: <20071015161355.CDC992CA32C@lawyers.icir.org> <44C4AF94-CC5D-4702-914E-764583E2AADA@nokia.com> <78C9135A3D2ECE4B8162EBDCE82CAD77026345DE@nekter> <4717E7D6.7000407@isi.edu> <14C200C0-73DE-4550-A1E2-5B43BEE29BAF@nokia.com> <472756CC.8070809@isi.edu> <582A6F13-12CC-4B5C-8415-CBDAD73116AA@nokia.com> <4728A553.2020300@isi.edu> <6B3D5E1D-F2DA-428C-AAEF-6F548F48F4F5@nokia.com> <3DF7B46C-5246-470E-9C98-08A5AEADDAF3@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DF7B46C-5246-470E-9C98-08A5AEADDAF3@nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ext_Alfred_H=CEnes?= <ah@tr-sys.de>, tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0824813132=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org


Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> attached is a diff between -06 and my current working copy, to let the
> WG know about the changes I've made so far to address WG last call
> comments.
> 
> There were some suggestions discussed in response to Joe's and Alfred's
> comments that I haven't made, because the rest of the WG was silent,
> which I interpreted as lack of consensus for the change. Speak up if you
> disagree with this resolution.

I have spoken before on this point in general. Apathy is not consensus.

Apathy can be a reason to not include a change, but that's the reason.
Not consensus.

Joe

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm