Re: [tcpm] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Thu, 25 March 2021 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31A33A1781; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WenIpViQRQc3; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF743A1784; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538E825A42; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:30:28 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1616664628; bh=soAQlxYpQ8XEh1QU4rkyrzg8OtHkZcLBgpjjwNIRWWI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=zZY+D+q3PLVub2gnNfLvsr/mO7A7/psnSEROKzUB4sp0aYC2Bf8tacyodkO4P3xOA gkEv+V5L6Jk0WccpXmTAIGqXKSiR0Nhux6692F4rxHcMxyde9cSlGxiSL5LXqDPyKJ 2BfSX0tfe/TQ8+JZAv6BeHeZW7vo17uShKY65W/Q=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4MmS_S2Os6E; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:30:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rznt8201.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8201.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.48.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:30:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (134.108.48.165) by rznt8201.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (134.108.48.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:30:27 +0100
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0]) by rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0%3]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.009; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:30:27 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXIViUAB+KxgoGdUWL2W3abvJfVqqUbw7w
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:30:27 +0000
Message-ID: <5d44bd2ed3144a4b90df514fe52fbbc1@hs-esslingen.de>
References: <161666423177.6408.1029658445364068197@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161666423177.6408.1029658445364068197@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.140.248]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/bQQSzRqUJN1nP05EN6FrOjLlXVI>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:30:36 -0000

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> "Appendix C", paragraph 1, discuss:
> > Appendix C: Automating the Initial Window in TCP over Long Timescales
> 
> The content of this appendix seems to be unrelated to TCB sharing and reads
> like
> a separate document - why is it included in this document?

For what it is worth, the shepherd write-up contains a summary of the TCPM discussions regarding inclusion of Appendix C.

Michael