[tcpm] Re: Secdir early review of draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-30

[Michael Tuexen <[e-mail]>]

> On 13. Sep 2024, at 09:58, Scott Kelly via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Scott Kelly
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.
> 
> The summary of the review is Ready.
> 
> I did an early review of this document in April of 2021. At that time, I said
> I'm not a TCP or ECN expert, so please take my comments with a proverbial grain
> of salt. Nothing has changed, I am still not a TCP or ECN expert.
> 
> The security considerations in the original draft contained a TODO about a
> potential covert channel; this document still contains the TODO. I think this
Wasn't the ToDo removed in revision 15:

https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-14&url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-15&difftype=--html

Or are you referring to some other statement you consider a ToDO?

Best regards
Michael
> should be resolved before publication, but I leave this to the AD. I have
> nothing new to add.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]