Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010

Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Fri, 16 April 2010 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1452C3A68EB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.204
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xv9XjCkTSeiW for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CFD3A684D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpu.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:143]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728E24C0CC; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:48:43 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:48:43 +0900
Message-Id: <20100416.094843.13723382.nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:48:58 -0000

Hello Eddy,

Thank you so much. Just a small correction..

 > NewReno Modification
 > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt
 > Action: need WG to read/discuss
 >         presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption
 > 

Please use the following link

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-02.txt

Thanks,
--
Yoshifumi Nishida
nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp


From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:06 -0500
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>

 > Hello TCPMers, below is a snapshot of the WG status as of
 > this week.  There are a few updates following the IETF 77
 > meeting.  We're up to 4 documents in the RFC Editor queue,
 > 1 ready to go to the IESG, 2 more in WGLC, and there are a
 > couple getting close to ready for WGLC.  Then there are a
 > number of them that we need to look at and check consensus
 > on whether they should become WG documents or not,
 > particularly the NewReno proposed modification has been
 > floating around for awhile, and hasn't had much feedback
 > lately.  If people can focus on the two in WGLC and on the
 > NewReno proposal, I think that would be healthy for progress.
 > 
 > Also, there are draft notes from IETF 77 (thanks to Jamshid
 > and Matt for taking notes, any errors are probably mine in
 > merging them!).  Vetting these would also be helpful:
 > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/minutes/tcpm.txt
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > WG Items Nearing RFC Publication
 > ================================
 > 
 > Early-Retransmit
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-04.txt
 > Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009
 > Status: In RFC Editor's queue
 > Action: None in TCPM
 > 
 > ICMP Attacks
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-11.txt
 > Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009
 > Status: finished IETF LC, with IESG
 > Action: None in TCPM
 > 
 > TCP Authentication Option
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt
 > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009
 > Status: In RFC Editor's queue
 > Action: None in TCPM
 > 
 > TCP Authentication Option Crypto
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt
 > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec
 > Status: In RFC Editor's queue
 > Action: None in TCPM
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC
 > ============================================
 > 
 > Urgent Pointer
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-05.txt
 > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010
 > Status: updated after WGLC
 > Action: chairs (David) writing PROTO for sending to IESG
 > 
 > MSS Option
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt
 > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
 > Status: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended)
 >         2nd WGLC started at IETF 77, and is ended with few comments
 > Action: David will check with commenters from first WGLC to see
 >         if issues are closed
 > 
 >         Wes will write PROTO and send to the IESG, after WGLC
 >         completes
 > 
 > Long Connectivity Disruptions
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-lcd-00.txt
 > (need to submit WG version)
 > Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010
 > Status: In WGLC
 > Action: WGLC to last 2 weeks, started on 4/13
 > 
 > 
 > Active WG Items
 > ===============
 > 
 > 1323bis
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
 > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
 > Status: Needs revision
 > Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman)
 > 
 > TCP Security
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt
 > Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
 > Status: outline discussion dying off?  content needs work
 > Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not attained
 >           very clear consensus
 >         WG has begun working on recommendations while still looking for a
 >           possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont)
 >         progress on recommendations made at IETF 77 needs to be worked into
 >           the next version of draft (D. Borman to work w/ Fernando)
 > 
 > SACK Entry
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01.txt
 > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
 > Action: need WG to read/discuss
 >         TBD how this relates to 3517, and if it will update it; authors are
 >           to determine how much additional time this might take as a bis
 >           document versus standalone
 > 
 > Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition
 > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt
 > Status: discussed on mailing list and in face-to-face meetings
 > Action: authors to submit WG version
 >         WG determine what to do with socket option section
 >         then WGLC
 > 
 > 
 > Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items
 > =========================================
 > 
 > Timestamps
 > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
 > Status: consensus to work on some portions of this, possibly as a part of the
 >           1323bis document
 > Action: need to determine if the accepted portions can be worked into 1323bis
 > 
 > 
 > Other Proposals Not Yet Decided On
 > ==================================
 > 
 > NewReno Modification
 > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt
 > Action: need WG to read/discuss
 >         presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption
 > 
 > AO NAT
 > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-00.txt
 > Status: IETF 77 discussion determined this should be Experimental, whether or
 >           not it is a WG document; need to ask TCPM list
 > Action: need to poll mailing list about path forward
 > 
 > Increasing TCP's Initial Window
 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00
 > Status: presented in Anaheim; lots of interest
 >         need to keep discussing; the work is in verifying that this is a good
 >           idea, moreso than documenting the change
 > Action: WG to continue to discuss
 > 
 > Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer
 > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt
 > Status: presented briefly at IETF 77, also well-discussed on mailing list
 >           earlier and at IETF 75
 > Action: need to poll for becoming a WG document
 > 
 > 
 > Older & Expired Documents Discussed
 > ===================================
 > 
 > discussions on Rate-Halving
 > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt
 > Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether
 >         it needs to be revived
 > 
 > Faster Application Handshakes with SYN/ACK Payloads
 > expired draft-agl-tcpm-sadata-01
 > Status: expired; not specifically polled for adoption in WG
 > 
 > 
 > Documents Not Adopted by WG
 > ===========================
 > 
 > TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery
 > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt
 > Status: discussed on mailing list and updated in response
 >         poll for working group adoption opened on 12/9, responses
 >           desired by 12/23
 >         decision not to adopt by WG; IESG may allow publication and
 >           option number assignment at their discretion, but TCPM does
 >           not have consensus to do this work
 >         background presented at IETF 77
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Other WG Activities
 > ===================
 > 
 > Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs:
 > 
 > RFC0793 (1496)  3.9  	Technical  	Legacy  Yin Shuming  		2008-08-27
 > RFC0793 (1561) 	3.2 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1562) 	3.3 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1563) 	3.4 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1564) 	3.7 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1565) 	3.8 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1566) 	3.9 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1567) 	3.9 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1568) 	3.9 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1569) 	2.4 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1570) 	2.7 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1571) 	3.1 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > RFC0793 (1572) 	3.4 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > --
 > Wes Eddy
 > MTI Systems
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > tcpm mailing list
 > tcpm@ietf.org
 > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm