Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Fri, 16 April 2010 00:48 UTC
Return-Path: <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1452C3A68EB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.204
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xv9XjCkTSeiW for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CFD3A684D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpu.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:143]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728E24C0CC; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:48:43 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:48:43 +0900
Message-Id: <20100416.094843.13723382.nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:48:58 -0000
Hello Eddy, Thank you so much. Just a small correction.. > NewReno Modification > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt > Action: need WG to read/discuss > presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption > Please use the following link http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-02.txt Thanks, -- Yoshifumi Nishida nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Subject: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:06 -0500 Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> > Hello TCPMers, below is a snapshot of the WG status as of > this week. There are a few updates following the IETF 77 > meeting. We're up to 4 documents in the RFC Editor queue, > 1 ready to go to the IESG, 2 more in WGLC, and there are a > couple getting close to ready for WGLC. Then there are a > number of them that we need to look at and check consensus > on whether they should become WG documents or not, > particularly the NewReno proposed modification has been > floating around for awhile, and hasn't had much feedback > lately. If people can focus on the two in WGLC and on the > NewReno proposal, I think that would be healthy for progress. > > Also, there are draft notes from IETF 77 (thanks to Jamshid > and Matt for taking notes, any errors are probably mine in > merging them!). Vetting these would also be helpful: > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/minutes/tcpm.txt > > > > WG Items Nearing RFC Publication > ================================ > > Early-Retransmit > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-04.txt > Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009 > Status: In RFC Editor's queue > Action: None in TCPM > > ICMP Attacks > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-11.txt > Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009 > Status: finished IETF LC, with IESG > Action: None in TCPM > > TCP Authentication Option > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009 > Status: In RFC Editor's queue > Action: None in TCPM > > TCP Authentication Option Crypto > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec > Status: In RFC Editor's queue > Action: None in TCPM > > > > WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC > ============================================ > > Urgent Pointer > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-05.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010 > Status: updated after WGLC > Action: chairs (David) writing PROTO for sending to IESG > > MSS Option > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 > Status: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended) > 2nd WGLC started at IETF 77, and is ended with few comments > Action: David will check with commenters from first WGLC to see > if issues are closed > > Wes will write PROTO and send to the IESG, after WGLC > completes > > Long Connectivity Disruptions > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-lcd-00.txt > (need to submit WG version) > Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010 > Status: In WGLC > Action: WGLC to last 2 weeks, started on 4/13 > > > Active WG Items > =============== > > 1323bis > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 > Status: Needs revision > Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman) > > TCP Security > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt > Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010 > Status: outline discussion dying off? content needs work > Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not attained > very clear consensus > WG has begun working on recommendations while still looking for a > possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont) > progress on recommendations made at IETF 77 needs to be worked into > the next version of draft (D. Borman to work w/ Fernando) > > SACK Entry > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01.txt > Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010 > Action: need WG to read/discuss > TBD how this relates to 3517, and if it will update it; authors are > to determine how much additional time this might take as a bis > document versus standalone > > Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt > Status: discussed on mailing list and in face-to-face meetings > Action: authors to submit WG version > WG determine what to do with socket option section > then WGLC > > > Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items > ========================================= > > Timestamps > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt > Status: consensus to work on some portions of this, possibly as a part of the > 1323bis document > Action: need to determine if the accepted portions can be worked into 1323bis > > > Other Proposals Not Yet Decided On > ================================== > > NewReno Modification > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt > Action: need WG to read/discuss > presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption > > AO NAT > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-00.txt > Status: IETF 77 discussion determined this should be Experimental, whether or > not it is a WG document; need to ask TCPM list > Action: need to poll mailing list about path forward > > Increasing TCP's Initial Window > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00 > Status: presented in Anaheim; lots of interest > need to keep discussing; the work is in verifying that this is a good > idea, moreso than documenting the change > Action: WG to continue to discuss > > Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt > Status: presented briefly at IETF 77, also well-discussed on mailing list > earlier and at IETF 75 > Action: need to poll for becoming a WG document > > > Older & Expired Documents Discussed > =================================== > > discussions on Rate-Halving > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt > Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether > it needs to be revived > > Faster Application Handshakes with SYN/ACK Payloads > expired draft-agl-tcpm-sadata-01 > Status: expired; not specifically polled for adoption in WG > > > Documents Not Adopted by WG > =========================== > > TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt > Status: discussed on mailing list and updated in response > poll for working group adoption opened on 12/9, responses > desired by 12/23 > decision not to adopt by WG; IESG may allow publication and > option number assignment at their discretion, but TCPM does > not have consensus to do this work > background presented at IETF 77 > > > > Other WG Activities > =================== > > Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs: > > RFC0793 (1496) 3.9 Technical Legacy Yin Shuming 2008-08-27 > RFC0793 (1561) 3.2 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1562) 3.3 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1563) 3.4 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1564) 3.7 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1565) 3.8 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1566) 3.9 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1567) 3.9 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1568) 3.9 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1569) 2.4 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1570) 2.7 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1571) 3.1 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > RFC0793 (1572) 3.4 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 > > > > > -- > Wes Eddy > MTI Systems > > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Alexander Zimmermann