Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05.txt
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 16:39 UTC
Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEE712025F
for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5,
USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5bY9LrXupBHS for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 6 May 2019 09:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832891201E6
for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id y2so16293739wmi.5
for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=WtTZAe0hg6Ovcj+zAUj2+MUiCbixCoE0G9Mboc03EhU=;
b=P5+Y2aaxg1qrr/YW7sw1YoBJk4YXOaXnAmAmz3gf1a1h8Q6YAthyiyJ4e+oAbt/b3m
Gnu26CQ/ddlLG0LQALJeygyYNhhnc64XyPCU4PkSI6n764HxOjOLfLGT6hrcw+KrjQcH
CX9bmwU+UtWXOvadj0XDVswQMzwvfK6daR502fgD76r4PcMpEsde1ZBvhmwUiJlNHdfo
0jokxRpqpKnopLtTswbJwFWJkhdvfh3Rmq87B7BAd6QiZEuhzzWtBXLq+CG58K5e/+E5
pNU5e61Svg9wJg6wVhHdLHZuyMb6eRL25PFFS+8GuWLi0tsUB79vWeu1Y7rPhkKmwgKa
HYFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=WtTZAe0hg6Ovcj+zAUj2+MUiCbixCoE0G9Mboc03EhU=;
b=AYxI7/r/2Wf+P7Xl/WA+/ro6kHoZcKrdOA7wZI9uW7km0nuwwKIsAYdvfxUIABOyRM
qD4sdL2UwueGU1rsXgkfSaxxDvilOb65U2LSjeEA6A0Ea1SIyufvi2MaRrRoyCqSw8lS
U0gaeTpIpt6mWKXTCXhsPz/Oz8loFZfoCjfdeVXpfxMzRTqnV09HbELE3/WVay1danWG
T2UxKdmmEOzm4abQZtiVXn63EG2dDGvATQqUFOb0KSsbiwXGsgm26rhuBr4ZBuXhKpq/
3Teajsa9epELaTUdIvqugGyfUfPi89Y/ReeTegHU4QJxT/ugHzA5OUv+jsAFJrZzYtlI
cbRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXs465P851YhYrL6W3mUC0aSVfo6cKjGqn+QKy2kTAhJeF9EF2Q
zb9N8BnRDQaPiC6K6MobHuP17o5wShivN9+82rC6qQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCquvqNfydgxmft0E6Ay8eakCdN8pAIfkDcGRLFL2tye9wPNhGRRhbqS6iJDiw89kqIuTn0I1KqbbGP4RY36w=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2101:: with SMTP id
u1mr7365280wml.36.1557160705132;
Mon, 06 May 2019 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155632918775.6767.10665022766872955742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
<CAK6E8=cQ8LH-d0snNGSSSwuUkNtYrSBNZs90ObskRahB6=GjeQ@mail.gmail.com>
<6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D2E45F5@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D2E45F5@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:37:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=ez=q--8Y5s=2BR3NCuktDOj_5SLChwOo687uQR=0qR9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b0b63705883aba8a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/bZxZLeMHxiTR5lLXgsKem3-Ki8w>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>,
<mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>,
<mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 16:39:28 -0000
Thanks Mchael. Noted and will correct in the next revision. On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:19 AM Scharf, Michael < Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote: > Hi Yuchung, > > > > A purely editorial comment on the new text in -05: > > > > The definition of terms has been updated by RFC 8174 and the new suggested > wording is: > > > > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL > > NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", > > "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as > > described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they > > appear in all capitals, as shown here. > > > > Unless there are good reasons to deviate, IMHO it would make sense to use > the default text. > > > > Also, note that there is some use of capital letter terms before Section > 5. The definition should probably be introduced before the first use (in > the body). > > > > Finally, draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05 references RFC2119 three times, which may > be a tooling bug. > > > > Those editorial nits can be fixed later in the publication process, but as > these are low hanging fruits, IMHO it would make sense to correct them in > the next version. > > > > Thanks > > > > Michael > > > > > > *From:* Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, April 27, 2019 3:43 AM > *To:* tcpm-chairs@ietf.org; tcpm@ietf.org Extensions <tcpm@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05.txt > > > > Hi we are posting new draft per chairs' request for discussion on status. > > > > 04-05 diffs are minor edits for clarification raised by many reviewers > (thanks!). No changes to algorithm / protocol. > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Date: Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:39 PM > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05.txt > To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>om>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>om>, > Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@google.com>om>, Nandita Dukkipati < > nanditad@google.com> > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05.txt > has been successfully submitted by Yuchung Cheng and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-tcpm-rack > Revision: 05 > Title: RACK: a time-based fast loss detection algorithm for TCP > Document date: 2019-04-26 > Group: tcpm > Pages: 29 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05 > Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-05 > > Abstract: > This document presents a new TCP loss detection algorithm called RACK > ("Recent ACKnowledgment"). RACK uses the notion of time, instead of > packet or sequence counts, to detect losses, for modern TCP > implementations that can support per-packet timestamps and the > selective acknowledgment (SACK) option. It is intended to replace > the conventional DUPACK threshold approach and its variants, as well > as other nonstandard approaches. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
- [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ie… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-iet… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-iet… Yuchung Cheng