Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-anumita-tcp-stronger-checksum-00.txt

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <> Wed, 26 May 2010 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6861F3A67B7 for <>; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.995
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.604, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pm+tz53pc--s for <>; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E601A3A67A3 for <>; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1C910838F for <>; Tue, 25 May 2010 21:19:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4Q2JkuC017582 for <>; Tue, 25 May 2010 21:19:46 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Tue, 25 May 2010 21:19:46 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <>
To: "" <>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 21:17:29 -0500
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-anumita-tcp-stronger-checksum-00.txt
Thread-Index: Acr8YDCU69f7609eRNOe85xLgVDwaQAGWb4s
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-05-25_02:2010-02-06, 2010-05-25, 2010-05-25 signatures=0
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-anumita-tcp-stronger-checksum-00.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:20:40 -0000

FYI - This I-D was accidentally posted as a WG document rather than an individual submission.  We are working to have the posting corrected.  Thanks for bearing with this :).

From: [] On Behalf Of []
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:15 PM
Subject: [tcpm] I-D     Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-anumita-tcp-stronger-checksum-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Support for Stronger Error Detection Codes in TCP for Jumbo Frames
        Author(s)       : A. Biswas
        Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-anumita-tcp-stronger-checksum-00.txt
        Pages           : 10
        Date            : 2010-05-25

There is a class of data serving protocols and applications that
cannot tolerate undetected data corruption on the wire.  Data
corruption could occur at the source in software, in the network
interface card, out on the link, on intermediate routers or at the
destination network interface card or node.  The Ethernet CRC and the
16-bit checksum in the TCP/UDP headers are used to detect data
errors.  Most applications rely on these checksums to detect data
corruptions and do not use any checksums or CRC checks at their
level.  Research has shown that the TCP/UDP checksums are catching a
significant number of errors, however, the research suggests that one
packet in 10 billion will have an error that goes undetected for
Ethernet MTU frames (MTU of 1500).  Under certain situations, "bad"
hosts can introduce undetected errors at a much higher frequency and
order.  With the use of Jumbo frames on the rise, and therefore more
data bits on the wire that could be corrupted, the current 16-bit
TCP/UDP checksum, or the Ethernet 32-bit CRC are simply not
sufficient for detecting errors.  This document specifies a proposal
to use stronger checksum algorithms for TCP Jumbo Frames for IPv4 and
IPv6 networks.  The Castagnoli CRC 32C algorithm used in iSCSI and
SCTP is proposed as the error detection code of choice.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the