Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt

Hi,

OK, let's move this document forward as-is.

Thanks,
Lars

On 2008-12-12, at 9:31, Fernando Gont wrote:

> At 02:01 a.m. 11/12/2008, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>> I think we need others to speak up, so we can come to consensus on
>>> what to do here.
>>
>> As requested: I think the document is fine just as it is.  This has
>> been going on far too long already and I just wish it was done.
>>
>> I could also live with re-adding some material, but because that
>> would result in another 6+ months of arguments with the text etc I
>> don't look forward to that option.
>
> FWIW, I fully agree with Pekka.
>
>
>
>> I wish someone would write another I-D on implementation and
>> deployment experiences with parallel TCP establishment approaches
>> (maybe someone from Apple could help here).  But I don't think this
>> is something that should be tied to the fate of this draft.
>
> I fully agree with Pekka in this respect, too.
>
> FWIW, I volunteer to work a bit more on the "parallel connections"
> stuff, and getting an I-D published on this (and getting whoever has
> implementation/deployment experience in this involved). But as Pekka
> said, I don't think the soft errors draft should be tied to any of
> this "parallel connections" stuff.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>
>
>

Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt

Attachment: smime.p7s