Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 19 December 2008 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75273A69F2; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1683A6A15 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:20:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.740, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xn5e8Id+3L38 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (host-39.nrln.net [212.213.221.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857063A6911 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.255.2] (a88-112-30-134.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.112.30.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBJDJesd046895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:19:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <D80A7F1E-D489-4257-A546-0FB95EE8DB3F@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <200812120740.mBC7ebf3006649@venus.xmundo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:19:39 +0200
References: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A3C6EEA@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <200811121548.mACFmKLY007025@venus.xmundo.net> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A010748D4@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <200812030857.mB38v6ND009886@venus.xmundo.net> <754037F5-4ADA-4A74-A6A0-99EB3ACB5DFD@nokia.com> <200812030935.mB39Z5P5007692@venus.xmundo.net> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E85CCB8@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <F4C852B0-1D36-4EF8-819F-4BE04A0107BF@nokia.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0812110657200.14388@netcore.fi> <200812120740.mBC7ebf3006649@venus.xmundo.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (mail.fit.nokia.com [212.213.221.39]); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:19:45 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8786/Fri Dec 19 12:30:31 2008 on fit.nokia.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "david.borman@windriver.com" <david.borman@windriver.com>, "weddy@grc.nasa.gov" <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>, "Black_David@emc.com" <Black_David@emc.com>, "Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1926377456=="
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

OK, let's move this document forward as-is.

Thanks,
Lars

On 2008-12-12, at 9:31, Fernando Gont wrote:

> At 02:01 a.m. 11/12/2008, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>> I think we need others to speak up, so we can come to consensus on
>>> what to do here.
>>
>> As requested: I think the document is fine just as it is.  This has
>> been going on far too long already and I just wish it was done.
>>
>> I could also live with re-adding some material, but because that
>> would result in another 6+ months of arguments with the text etc I
>> don't look forward to that option.
>
> FWIW, I fully agree with Pekka.
>
>
>
>> I wish someone would write another I-D on implementation and
>> deployment experiences with parallel TCP establishment approaches
>> (maybe someone from Apple could help here).  But I don't think this
>> is something that should be tied to the fate of this draft.
>
> I fully agree with Pekka in this respect, too.
>
> FWIW, I volunteer to work a bit more on the "parallel connections"
> stuff, and getting an I-D published on this (and getting whoever has
> implementation/deployment experience in this involved). But as Pekka
> said, I don't think the soft errors draft should be tied to any of
> this "parallel connections" stuff.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm