IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-08: (with COMMENT)

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 04 March 2022 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A10E3A0FCB; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:50:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdbO0H3iiZuy; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-1.web-hosting.com (server217-1.web-hosting.com [198.54.114.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10C83A1024; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 19:50:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=92us1n1MMsj2gFqVyVsl6V9Xf6lyrXKH4JUCMGjGYrA=; b=kGQcW73qe/Cl2j+/uhfj1D608U D8n7A6E7XmFGTBWbfDboVK7lBpYylm2gbl3NeL9Rt8yLwddl5hjiEvktl/47t5GYcsylKSrsVRyYP rfWr84LorqeMffNtFWrFDxS8b8dsHl86HPU3EmAfRDlsNq5BdLj8AE8fSxvoc2RBQLKBEzvMRovUS vAYM/8o72E0d0yW1hqB85NeUoNTrS8SzY9DuUpuxgYpy5kOIxXRpPLBfTHIU4ngVTrrTMkrNR6cI3 3tq1H62/XsfMvVzyC9fqigwVkq7iIqtMlhL5xKM98MKH1ViiOicFKjGmbRIdI3r3mZHKAoOqJiQPn kBF86SSA==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:58951 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1nPyxS-009HUU-Ea; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 22:50:27 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7628FE52-AC28-4330-A67F-FBB85E82366F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <164621482367.18087.8776956171199961707@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:50:21 -0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de
Message-Id: <3ADCA28F-3C7D-4178-B1AA-AF895D89990C@strayalpha.com>
References: <164621482367.18087.8776956171199961707@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/dnefDAc69P6nA5N1D3Rm9iwG1_o>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 03:50:35 -0000

Hi, Zahed,

To your point below, yes. There is no clear need to hold this document up to be in the “group” with 793bis and there’s no reason to have this refer to the 793 draft, as it is dependent on neither vs. the original 793.

if this happens to be published after 793bis, the RFC Editor will make the needed updates.

Joe

—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

> On Mar 2, 2022, at 1:53 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for the efforts here.
> 
> Should this specification still be referring (normative) to RFC793 while 793-bis is almost complete?
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email