[tcpm] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24

Sarah Banks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 August 2021 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048FB3A203C; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Sarah Banks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <ops-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.35.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <162794548097.12686.15693645370976846299@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 16:04:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/eBH4rRaTIc6pAMubKBWUUY48pzQ>
Subject: [tcpm] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 23:04:41 -0000

Reviewer: Sarah Banks
Review result: Ready

I’ve reviewed the draft and have no concerns or changes to raise. Since the
draft is replacing RFC 793 and chunks of other documents I found this a bit
awkward, but no more awkward than the spaghetti soup that is TCP across any
number of drafts today, anyhow. Nits is taking forever to run; I’d encourage
the authors to ensure nits is clean. Otherwise, the draft is good to go.