Re: [tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03

Sangtae Ha <Sangtae.Ha@Colorado.EDU> Wed, 25 August 2021 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sangtae.ha@colorado.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A983A1E9E; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=colorado.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9N0eETjaRat1; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmx5.colorado.edu (ipmx5.colorado.edu [128.138.128.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17FC63A1E9B; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=colorado.edu; l=8784; q=dns/txt; s=IPMX-SMTP; t=1629857069; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id: subject:to:cc:from; bh=dm+mgDJCjlgyPezD/cbcgPbzFbEh06YdzryxFNIOS8w=; b=EHLpdjqNFSh/9/A38IQM9jV7o6yJie05ikh3oJTHir+K3q8T/GXdYgBe JTmsALLOrB4j/l9oVt9bBO6+6LSj2sfuhjoUnvFy8ilBr1xbRdYmfMMQG vHRquU1CrI17He+Ix3hxmrRwc2BoYRYVbwgzTNRrDbwwG4svESNvs0gXw vHO2vuPOvQ2qiZiGkyDot4S3fJj52qfJXDLY3opNT5JS6FE5euvxj5MHL bKMmuvmmY/zQcmXs2ILNAM/MIzST5B3oqzj7i8jo22fqMkHom8eAsUCwb vSwelGc6vHomLUMvMtvcQTzaZcslygewxHjF270laGpC/0nKpUX2xNlsv w==;
IronPort-SDR: IwUDSuChytl68EvV8W3EFGjbR8u5+ZswPCAJSGcc3vV8uEsixUvF08LOjeQHhuoMlCCazX3GJR Xd5pdJJ9oV0kndEOP4ff/SSubJHa0TgV0=
From: Sangtae Ha <Sangtae.Ha@Colorado.EDU>
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:uIfTlqBC733BMGXlHemI55DYdb4zR+YMi2TDGXoBLyC9E/bo7v xG885rtiMc5AxwZJhko7G90cq7Lk80l6QFhLX5VI3KNGLbUSmTQr2KhrGSpwEIdReOkdK1Fp 0LT4FOTPP1BVh+yeDg4Ae5FN4khP2K6rqhi+ub71oFd3AJV0it1WpE48+gfnFLeA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AaAADdoyVhfyzeVdFaDg4BAQEBAQEHAQESAQEEBAEBggYGAQELAYEigX9WbIRHgR6PawOKXopkhjEUgWgCCQEBAQEBAQEBAQkqAQoMBAEBhGoCgisCJTUIDgECBAEBAQEDAgwBAQYBAQEBAQEFBBQBAQ0LEAg4QGRogU+BdAs0DYZCAQEBAQIBAQEQEUsLBQsLCwYEAQEBKgICIQEFDQEFARQIBhMiglCCVQMOIQ+daYEEPYo4eoExgQGHIQ1OAQkNgV0GgToBhwsBAYZoJxCBVUSBFTaCcz6CIEIBAQKBKQESASmDD4JkBIYvHipDEFsLZg4EBh4CdpE2BIJ8AYtnin+RQF4HDoMfgUKXMYVmLINli2SGAZEupg2VQhAjgT8BZD5wck4xBoIyTQECAQINAQICAwECAQIJAQEClyOFBWQlMAI2AgYBCgEBAwmOfwEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2AaAADdoyVhfyzeVdFaDg4BAQEBAQEHAQESAQEEBAEBggYGAQELAYEigX9WbIRHgR6PawOKXopkhjEUgWgCCQEBAQEBAQEBAQkqAQoMBAEBhGoCgisCJTUIDgECBAEBAQEDAgwBAQYBAQEBAQEFBBQBAQ0LEAg4QGRogU+BdAs0DYZCAQEBAQIBAQEQEUsLBQsLCwYEAQEBKgICIQEFDQEFARQIBhMiglCCVQMOIQ+daYEEPYo4eoExgQGHIQ1OAQkNgV0GgToBhwsBAYZoJxCBVUSBFTaCcz6CIEIBAQKBKQESASmDD4JkBIYvHipDEFsLZg4EBh4CdpE2BIJ8AYtnin+RQF4HDoMfgUKXMYVmLINli2SGAZEupg2VQhAjgT8BZD5wck4xBoIyTQECAQINAQICAwECAQIJAQEClyOFBWQlMAI2AgYBCgEBAwmOfwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.84,349,1620712800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="48664347"
Received: from mail-ua1-f44.google.com ([209.85.222.44]) by smtp.colorado.edu with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Aug 2021 20:04:27 -0600
Received: by mail-ua1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 90so13696861uax.5; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532leQFt9fKDxq+GjmkLgpQYWLpn30Tk6CgcxWWTQPnENpiDX5C7 jGG+OAdlMVRlRKbeEWGd5wH0t1ZGgYEyMQKru/I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7n4e6oQtAuatsiw/EFBkBW62twatk6lNdto8IrdGbbDk70h7PNhsCxMxaEgfbY34Xg5FJ3MbPJsU3sw5PM/0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:5f4:: with SMTP id w20mr30133959vsf.34.1629857066590; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR08MB3933F2267B75F45426F38BBCDAC69@SN6PR08MB3933.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR08MB3933F2267B75F45426F38BBCDAC69@SN6PR08MB3933.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:04:15 -0600
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOWuNSP3jfq3hG6QUnkXaFad3v+H6hfqoyypefmCOuHcNx+JEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOWuNSP3jfq3hG6QUnkXaFad3v+H6hfqoyypefmCOuHcNx+JEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lisong Xu <xu@unl.edu>
Cc: Injong Rhee <injongrhee@gmail.com>, Sangtae Ha <sangtae.ha@colorado.edu>, Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@apple.com>, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007d282205ca58abe0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/emFiCkEyHQb29CH_gYEHqxmQCIk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:04:35 -0000

Confirmed from my end too.

Best,
Sangtae

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 7:58 PM Lisong Xu <xu@unl.edu> wrote:

> Thank you, Vidhi!
>
> Yes, confirmed for me.
> Lisong
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Vidhi Goel
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 24, 2021 12:40 PM
> *To:* Lisong Xu; Injong Rhee; Sangtae Ha
> *Cc:* Yoshifumi Nishida; tcpm@ietf.org Extensions; tcpm-chairs
> *Subject:* Re: [tcpm] Concluding WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-03
>
> Non-NU Email
> ------------------------------
> +Lisong, Injong and Sangtae.
>
> 7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed.
>     If not, explain why?
>
> Could you reply to that email providing your individual confirmation about
> IPR disclosure?
>
> Thanks,
> Vidhi
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Vidhi Goel <
> vidhi_goel=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> 7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed.
>
>
> Confirmed from my end.
>
> Thanks,
> Vidhi
>
> On Aug 23, 2021, at 1:43 AM, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi authors,
>
> I start preparing the write-up for 8312bis draft to submit it to IESG.
> In order for this, could each of you provide the answer for the
> following question?
>
> 7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed.
>     If not, explain why?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 1:32 AM Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The chairs think 8312bis draft is in good shape and it's ready for
> submission.
> We know we had some discussions on how to handle ABC draft in the draft
> during the last WG meeting and there are on-going related discussions on
> the ML.
> However, we still think we can proceed with the draft as the
> relevance between the draft and the current discussions is not very high.
>
> If anyone has different thoughts on this, please let us know.
> Otherwise, we will prepare a writeup soon and submit it to IESG.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
>
>