Re: [tcpm] Working group acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06 targeting informational status

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Mon, 25 March 2019 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D50E1205AC for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EftOVtT11YhZ for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D741112059A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B1325A19 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:37:59 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1553535479; bh=tNI5DIIo6YXFc3ISu3ulk7371YeVXUHTYnQbqEWcm1Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PoQGz58Be4N16853izxW2Jy8K6xRejek1NWB9jpbdCp7qITGHoL+SyxIoxZNgc53a e7AUwIe3vtH9i57bZC/bpdJUpBskdPydr4EZCmNIjJg/Zta8XRsLUHMMLPFQuDgWU+ i9eRnA8DV1bqdVdukev9xbCiBb+1UgXi0YVPTqZM=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kvo0QP9PoswF for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:37:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.29.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:37:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([169.254.3.111]) by rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::bd73:d6a9:24d7:95f1%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:37:57 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Working group acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06 targeting informational status
Thread-Index: AQHU1G616iHOJHkpoEO6XOB3g3fkFaYcuRwA
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:37:56 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D2803EA@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
References: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D24EEA4@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D24EEA4@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.29.249]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/f0XZcwm22uXG-CGePkgwpIEYObQ>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Working group acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06 targeting informational status
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:38:04 -0000

Hi all,

This e-mail concludes the acceptance call. As mentioned in today's meeting, the chairs believe that it is the working group consensus to adopt the document as informational.

I'll work on the charter milestone. Once the charter milestone is in place, I'll ask the authors to resubmit the document as draft-ietf-.

Thanks a lot

Michael


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcpm <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Scharf, Michael
> Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 11:48 PM
> To: tcpm@ietf.org
> Subject: [tcpm] Working group acceptance of draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06
> targeting informational status
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The document draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis has been discussed quite a bit in
> TCPM. One question has been the status (BCP or INFO). The version draft-
> touch-tcpm-2140bis-06 explicitly targets informational status and plans to
> obsolete RFC 2140 (which is informational, too).
> 
> The intention of this e-mail is to confirm that draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06
> should be adopted as informational TCPM working group item, i.e., that a
> new item should be added to the TCPM charter:
> 
>   Nov. 2019  Submit document on TCP Control Block Interdependence to the
> IESG for publication as Informational RFC
> 
> The adoption call runs on the TCPM mailing list until March 22. Please let us
> know if you support adoption of the document, or if there are any concerns.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Michael
> (TCPM co-chair)
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: tcpm [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Touch
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 5:52 PM
> To: tcpm@ietf.org
> Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-
> 06.txt
> 
> FYI -
> This version:
>     - obsoletes 2140
>     - says so in the abstract and intro
>     - includes a "changes from 2140" section summarizing the differences
> Note that the earlier versions did cite 2140, but did not as directly indicate
> that this is intended as its replacement.
> Joe
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:
> New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06.txt
> Date:
> Fri, 04 Jan 2019 08:49:25 -0800
> From:
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To:
> Safiqul Islam <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>,
> Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Joe Touch
> <touch@strayalpha.com>
> 
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Joe Touch and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name: draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis
> Revision: 06
> Title: TCP Control Block Interdependence
> Document date: 2019-01-04
> Group: Individual Submission
> Pages: 22
> URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06.txt
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis/
> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06
> Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis
> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-touch-tcpm-2140bis-06
> 
> Abstract:
> This memo updates and replaces RFC 2140's description of
> interdependent TCP control blocks, in which part of the TCP state is
> shared among similar concurrent or consecutive connections. TCP
> state includes a combination of parameters, such as connection
> state, current round-trip time estimates, congestion control
> information, and process information. Most of this state is
> maintained on a per-connection basis in the TCP Control Block (TCB),
> but implementations can (and do) share certain TCB information
> across connections to the same host. Such sharing is intended to
> improve overall transient transport performance, while maintaining
> backward-compatibility with existing implementations. The sharing
> described herein is limited to only the TCB initialization and so
> has no effect on the long-term behavior of TCP after a connection
> has been established.
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm