Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-13.txt
Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 08 May 2020 17:07 UTC
Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCD53A0D66 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 10:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qLylWsNoDXWT for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 10:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com (mail-ot1-f42.google.com [209.85.210.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A183A0D7F for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id j26so2055220ots.0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=h+YNVxIcmYZ7bp07/Bi1QtDSa06gqmIjctJiybw9/Dk=; b=RY2skKtCXryqGjjoBVZhVklpSCR3wWVUuNnKGo8dpgpCMsXsKcn2au1pTy5/zsWv/N 4kVC08D9S8sOb45O5H4SXP7PBOILHb0t+tbe0gBo9eVVg/6fQciDFTkc5dNvimCY3rF3 4dBP6rEtsG2ze0I8QBjtMPtOq+FiddvWRS1MuQCnhMxR5A2edifUfWT08GvBK18l4xY4 FOmKkOeCR8UA2J3t6vcQkNuxaXtlGNdM2P7/CIdbWzIvocZmAdcRfT8jHeQc5fVbEzRE /naMNpkHfJy69aNOPmyJzOFMc6wWf8D+bcpphSHjh6JkQr6/zOr+DVAOuhp4P73iRu8v bpSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY/Ax72gRFlPdge0S85TXOolva0Csf30Eavv2HMOK3Rfe0s4sYh iKNYEip7TZbxHlGbuRNUv57raf1PXQzxaQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKZyKHUzvZS0glBsA2v6qKU9Lbwq3lpaibPo0/SWI+d5TQe1qzokoGFAI0xacOhCPl0x7SUTQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7ad8:: with SMTP id m24mr3220295otn.22.1588957611148; Fri, 08 May 2020 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.253.174] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:3c34:d53e:4afc:de26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u82sm2347074oia.35.2020.05.08.10.06.50 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 May 2020 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:06:49 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <CD3D96A2-02BF-440D-B196-A8C221745449@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <158895749102.16082.17869942226392212066@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <158895749102.16082.17869942226392212066@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_017BF880-A588-4769-844A-267055FB9FE4_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/f4900lqPjHhwWpBQ8i2fj2QXPU0>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-13.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 17:07:12 -0000
This version includes clarifications stemming from Martin's AD review of the document. allman > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF. > > Title : Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection > Author : Mark Allman > Filename : draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-13.txt > Pages : 11 > Date : 2020-05-08 > > Abstract: > Many protocols must detect packet loss for various reasons (e.g., to > ensure reliability using retransmissions or to understand the level > of congestion along a network path). While many mechanisms have > been designed to detect loss, protocols ultimately can only count on > the passage of time without delivery confirmation to declare a > packet "lost". Each implementation of a time-based loss detection > mechanism represents a balance between correctness and timeliness > and therefore no implementation suits all situations. This document > provides high-level requirements for time-based loss detectors > appropriate for general use in the Internet. Within the > requirements, implementations have latitude to define particulars > that best address each situation. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-13 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-13 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-13 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
- [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-1… internet-drafts
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consid… Mark Allman