IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6104E1208F6 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:06:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EvGUVSD5aBCG for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F07141200D7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id c184so12017584pfb.0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:06:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DCR57VhUNFSaxByWjL/V7c27eEBJXQMUJqr1UeTeDfk=; b=uj9/j3aeXMS8cW/XB2gNojAGvtSleTruwhpiBiwEd5oZkVrPmUB8krMdbvnc9tUOee RE85t/bnQErDBhYQ/BvAbXXpswsfqpR8ljXUei1s6pWQMYo7FkoMDe3ocFt8yRuFZtjh xB2ta2fhI8BT00bSZnKRINsJkgYhf01kgwpLzCiDUh7sAf3x2CsA9mbBtPScd6g8u9Dt vFCTL4sAIMMeYRU5SuM+5DUd4OindyLaObUq0okO1POyWYOEVQeEqfunymgZscKz1hvI a27Tw/q0rrnrXIg8vHrxwMyviIQviMp9Ffy0aDVvPikhpTLRUUBx9anDPwhW5piNju5D iRQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DCR57VhUNFSaxByWjL/V7c27eEBJXQMUJqr1UeTeDfk=; b=Ffa0oX9Yq8xNJZHTgDAJN4ngaJ8OV67xWr6EzoZlJbW+HRNKpZTDxgqLAaQ9pZMCN2 0LiSKntI6NlgkqtzSUvXpfEmTtxNyjhtmF+quqeAJeok5TSKpJoZqaltms4lAKZawXmB /UmIGSH8ZTRFRd9SU4uqtgta1IOSUvCTYM+UyTZhdeYmL1RV5lUSOEj7IEoD5S1lFxyT k0gWu6iFR4zM8LHE0ybLzYgYkLlhvcOMKhz7NKJ43WJvin7JPszxOKSaX/uYmCpoZsmA 4ba4GK6VSTn4jEIL+fo9HRZujFPrIqlr9N6nuy4EOhLXmThwImMaVBDVjWLVk2NHRKyQ D1hA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUU4UDMwfniBXz9gOdgiNm4CBSTdLMGoVEzG7BSQz9IAXeBB2So G6ge4f1qYRYoMliFZ52OjKU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxi6HMdyVyiGjqrqT4YG5ZAM8DsMg4j3D55C8CCJFDnh4jMXziHIa8EkgYay2MH1Jhg1JCScg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:6086:: with SMTP id u128mr5153136pfb.4.1574161573598; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan ([182.55.197.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 83sm24053284pgh.86.2019.11.19.03.06.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 03:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB44256AB7B0B3864F67CD538EC24C0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:06:10 +0800
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9130FD0-C761-4225-9A13-2F68240D455A@gmail.com>
References: <HE1PR07MB44256AB7B0B3864F67CD538EC24C0@HE1PR07MB4425.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/fSxsHQJG9TuRfFd7peWemA83uFA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:06:15 -0000

> On 19 Nov, 2019, at 6:51 pm, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I am also in support of proposed standard for draft-ietf-tcpm-rack as this
> can potentially relax the strict ordering requirements in 5G deployments. I
> am not 100% certain of the actual value of proposed standard vs experimental
> ditto outside IETF but it is definitely not of negative impact. 
> 
> A question (perhaps already discussed on the mailing list): 
> How widely do you think that RACK will be deployed in TCP stacks in the near
> and more far perspective?. 
> I know that it is already in Linux. What about MS Windows, FreeBSD, IOS,
> Android ??

Android is Linux, to a first approximation, and thus inherits its networking capabilities.

FreeBSD I understand has a RACK-capable TCP stack, but which is not the default.  I think Rod Grimes should be able to clarify this, and he's also on this list.

Apple devices I do not know for sure about.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email