IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] (no subject)

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Tue, 01 July 2008 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518123A691D; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD623A691D for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.762, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JvSHDCrENmr for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31843A67D7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,730,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="61680619"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2008 22:41:09 -0700
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m615f9XM006880; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:41:09 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m615f96I028723; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 05:41:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:41:08 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:40:08 -0700
Message-ID: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58056ADBF7@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Index: AcjbPOw31GAccW+CR1uFnpdk6j4Mxg==
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2008 05:41:08.0981 (UTC) FILETIME=[101BE250:01C8DB3D]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=751; t=1214890869; x=1215754869; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Anantha=20Ramaiah=20(ananth)=22=20<ananth@cisco .com> |Subject:=20 |Sender:=20; bh=bmueIPxoQ2K6lovrrhjnMj4+ZMH3IFpkpeSy60RjdO4=; b=lb0KGZR3SsjcZ6obwiO1xva9rWWUkhx4Ff8jPZ66SDegFiNjBPld6+f7LX u9niAPrzdKsnkEP+9QM1ue/jymyhL1GsFBd4ihNdFN+t5UJFHxeRK1DhsJ8x RVsPQfKRGV;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=ananth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>, weddy@grc.nasa.gov
Subject: [tcpm] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

The persist state issue draft
[http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahesh-persist-timeout-02], which was
discussed in the mailing list last year, is now re-written into 2
separate drafts, the first one which clarifies the RFC 1122 verbiage
surrounding the zero window probes and the second one which talks about
the solutions in detail. This was done in response to the WG suggestions
(which included David Borman and Mark Allman).

You can find the copy of the first draft at :
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-00.txt.
Comments welcome.

The second draft which is also informational, talks about the possible
mitigations to the persist condition and will be posted at a later time.

Thanks,
-Anantha
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email