Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested for the document outline
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Wed, 09 September 2009 07:34 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC70528C141 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lu7AsehA6UG5 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97393A6843 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lars.lan (e701.rooms.aueb.gr [195.251.233.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n897Z3RN052917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:35:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-74--703403583"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AA74452.7060409@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:35:03 +0300
Message-Id: <D63FBE13-210E-4D75-A323-003F9D854DA9@nokia.com>
References: <4AA74452.7060409@gont.com.ar>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2)
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested for the document outline
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:34:50 -0000
On 2009-9-9, at 8:59, Fernando Gont wrote: > So let's set a new deadline for this second round off-comments: if you > have any comments regarding the document outline, please voice your > opinion till September 16th (Wednesday), 2009. Since you asked: As an individual, I have a preference for Joe's proposed outline. It's not a very strong one, however. Lars
- [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested for … Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested … Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested … Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested … Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested … Smith, Donald