Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-18.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555CF3A0D7D for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzDeYT8GFyrW for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D100C3A0D7C for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id l64so38987318qkb.8 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 11:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=+TtIAf+q067Q8Vzc6ed49+s8uEuEKEXYDO4rHYUV/5A=; b=RL1pbLhScd9EKAjIvuiM2+E6v7/vDkGW2PUDL9/WCTNaYFrLbUb+W7OlCRpl4JnO1f vv93uL3HqCaBNuhHzUKfOlajttJzjFVNNt3aaHmMCLix0zH7OyYONHgw5Y9kVU109/8m ukjl5/um4LYWD/cwDTH49rtUUNinq0FKHYUBpllvPxro8iUSP8jbYCNaNYCjIV53Qghy kh27/85WSfUQ+OckNFAnLLJx9UI5qKvoZmsByQ1a+AsR3eFKwUq/jE4zyDlUeVs1TJS5 Xuq8V8cvmDiIW9QsFI4V3RHs7gAWzeVcpGpc9LMTnWh1YCJNp1WcFnwrf0tdoMajLzX8 AaXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=+TtIAf+q067Q8Vzc6ed49+s8uEuEKEXYDO4rHYUV/5A=; b=CW80u6/cCPZIiBT9b2XsY/uVT2y9/RgaT2kC1WgfQsvzhUi9h/muxyf61Hip+ms6v0 VDXPzXQn6kCa6aKRQzk6fAL4SwZzpdJhnOOWMb8sfUjlyjj6bcyOvVsczuLfFECpbawn /mAD/cIJRz+hqhoLyUT78idssmlUFaSklx2sGxtbBASzjDLtj7oxlYX0A9XG2acOZ82h Bu0vWw+rbhoXvPxosn8Px50rfPJ/kzanOYM7ZgnpJ58xRJTDwg1td2cHd2VevlYluZ4z FadjSbR5ipJhu1yyaXLSzQa6LyjWjJVcFRUANUA74giygE7+17lVna7g526qTNJ+TJkB wEfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531e301M6bzNwsdCoipQTQx/Db9TAEz2L4lyNwKf9ob5HeejCyNR ziMJWOdfnxuXto376i0W89UILwr3X7kY9g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/fzwNs+oq8Z+0ruuKud8q5t5/ycNQ6dNrWcjL259ydHteOemYK9dbU18ikvM8yb995Jd6mw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1285:: with SMTP id w5mr9299205qki.21.1596737267633; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (user-12l31c7.cable.mindspring.com. [69.81.133.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm4465546qkn.53.2020.08.06.11.07.46 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 11:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <159673709647.13922.11176551547193000805@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <b902c65d-4864-ed57-c74b-21c22fa40357@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:07:45 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159673709647.13922.11176551547193000805@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/g8wJZBu2flhKLcD7JwlI4RjmqWI>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-18.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:07:50 -0000

This update basically just has a small update to use "Bit Offset" versus 
"Bit" (per Richard's comment in the IETF 108 virtual meeting) within the 
IANA considerations.


On 8/6/2020 2:04 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Transmission Control Protocol Specification
>          Author          : Wesley M. Eddy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-18.txt
> 	Pages           : 106
> 	Date            : 2020-08-06
>
> Abstract:
>     This document specifies the Internet's Transmission Control Protocol
>     (TCP).  TCP is an important transport layer protocol in the Internet
>     stack, and has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of
>     the Internet.  Over this time, a number of changes have been made to
>     TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been
>     documented in a piecemeal fashion.  This document collects and brings
>     those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793.
>     This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as 879, 2873, 6093, 6429,
>     6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793.  It updates RFC 1122,
>     and should be considered as a replacement for the portions of that
>     document dealing with TCP requirements.  It updates RFC 5961 due to a
>     small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED
>     state.
>
>     RFC EDITOR NOTE: If approved for publication as an RFC, this should
>     be marked additionally as "STD: 7" and replace RFC 793 in that role.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-18
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-18
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-18
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm