Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and Padding
Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Tue, 29 July 2008 13:49 UTC
Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CC628C308; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFE928C308 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uCQn4wyF3uV for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED4928C302 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.20.69] ([130.129.20.69]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6TDkElo003193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <488F1F06.4010508@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:45:42 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <20080729.060448.112613043.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <488EF15F.4070302@isi.edu> <20080729.065149.22600370.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080729.065149.22600370.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and Padding
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote: ... <what if we...> |> Use 2 bits for the KID; 1 is insufficient, and 2 is more than sufficient |> IMO. |> |> The MAC' is a half-word aligned MAC with the top 2 bits overwritten |> (i.e., it is NOT shifted right); the KID occupies those top 2 bits. |> |> If a user wants word alignment, pick a MAC length of N-2 bytes. |> |> Wouldn't that be simpler and more space efficient? | | We have 256 keys, and it is not enough. Can you explain this further? We're talking about the number of keys used within a single TCP connection; there isn't a clear need (AFAICT) for more than a very small number of these. | And is NOT simple and more complex from implemntation point of view | - eats a lot of cpu cycles. It would consume only two additional cycles in the following: header && 0011111111.... || keyID (store keyIDs as values 0, 64, 128, 192 so you don't need to shift them in/out) I.e., 2 opcodes to encode the bits in the location desired. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiPHwYACgkQE5f5cImnZruiYgCfQKKBKOf+WdLd8+6L06pppd99 KfEAoLOHaEFpvHaZik5EsN4vNNiuLtmE =MUsL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and P… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and P… YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and P… Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and P… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and P… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO Option Layout - Alignment and P… Ron Bonica