Re: [tcpm] Comments draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-06.txt

Thanks Gorry.
We have submitted a new version of the draft, addressing the comments.

BR,
Anna

On 2015-04-09 17:17, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>
> A few quick comments on this latest revision:
>
> * I believe this is a sender-side only change, but the abstract 
> doesn't explicitly say this, i.e. "This document specifies a 
> sender-only modification to TCP and SCTP "
>
> * The introduction does not explain why the WG has requested this to 
> be experimental (is it the maturity or options of the algorithm; 
> deployment experience; etc), e.g. "The specification in this draft is 
> classified as "Experimental" pending experience with deployed 
> implementations of the methods."
>
> * Section 4 specifies the experimental algorithm, it may be useful to 
> add a sentence at the start of this section that explicitly says this 
> "This section specifies the modifications required", to contrast with 
> the informative material in section 3,5,6.
>
> * I have reviewed section 7, and this seems to me to address the 
> SCTP-related comments received at the Dallas IETF meeting.
>
> * To avoid doubt by security reviewers, You could possibly also note 
> this in the security considerations section:  i.e. "This document 
> specifies an experimental sender-only modification to TCP and SCTP."
>
> Gorry
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm