RE: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Sat, 22 July 2006 20:45 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4OLd-0002rM-0O; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:45:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4OLb-0002rH-9z for tcpm@ietf.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:45:15 -0400
Received: from venus.xmundo.net ([201.216.232.56]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4OLZ-0001ro-L9 for tcpm@ietf.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:45:15 -0400
Received: from fgont.gont.com.ar (171-180-231-201.fibertel.com.ar [201.231.180.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6MKilso009017; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:44:49 -0300
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060722170818.05a59eb8@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:11:22 -0300
To: "Mahdavi, Jamshid" <jamshid.mahdavi@bluecoat.com>, <tcpm@ietf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: RE: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?
In-Reply-To: <D87D0DFD1BEB364D8E528F28527DD6130240571D@bcs-mail2.interna l.cacheflow.com>
References: <D87D0DFD1BEB364D8E528F28527DD6130240571D@bcs-mail2.internal.cacheflow.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc:
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

At 13:24 21/07/2006, Mahdavi, Jamshid wrote:

>What is the status of draft-eggert-tcpm-tcp-abort-timeout-option-01?  It
>may be of some use in situations like this.  I've recently seen another
>scenario where this would be useful, so I'd be interested in seeing that
>draft reposted...

It was merged with draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-auto-option into 
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto.

The latest revision is draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto-03.txt, available at 
the usual places (e.g., 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto-03.txt).

Feedback is more than welcome. ;-)

Kindest regards,

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1






_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm