IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] SYN/ACK Payloads, draft 01

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Wed, 13 August 2008 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A252528C16E; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B680D28C16E for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 769z0PpxlCDz for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1AE28C13E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.217.123.194] (194.sub-75-217-123.myvzw.com [75.217.123.194]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7DMG69f001278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48A35CFA.4060709@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:15:22 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
References: <396556a20808111035s2b974233o1e9d3671e82e3350@mail.gmail.com> <20080813172752.AA7A650846@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808131047q781675a3if23d727ef5ae918f@mail.gmail.com> <20080813181630.A1E6750848@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808131145y1be0fb4saeb7bbf74d078268@mail.gmail.com> <20080813195027.C4C5B50848@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808131307r65a9f6a0oe4365be029620b2c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <396556a20808131307r65a9f6a0oe4365be029620b2c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] SYN/ACK Payloads, draft 01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Adam Langley wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Eric Rescorla
| <ekr@networkresonance.com> wrote:
|> Right, but this has application-level semantics because the content
|> of the server's data is not what an unmodified client expects. So,
|> it's not just a timing issue: the server sends different data
|> to the client if this option is included or not.

This is, IMO, the most compelling argument that this mechanism ought to
be bound to a TCP port, not a TCP option.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkijXPoACgkQE5f5cImnZrsZUQCcDndN7ItoO3pAceRKuiNMS4Ie
qvQAoOcGYj0GVLsxRsDoA9tbs79A/jfO
=ZYHh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email