Re: [Tsvwg] Re: [tcpm] Revision ofdraft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Thu, 26 July 2007 18:59 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IE8Yw-0008M3-LC; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:59:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IE8Yt-00086V-Lp; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:59:47 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IE8Ys-0006Rq-Ab; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:59:47 -0400
Received: from [130.129.37.253] (dhcp-25fd.ietf69.org [130.129.37.253]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6QIxTJt004053; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46A8EF0A.1040400@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:59:22 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Re: [tcpm] Revision ofdraft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization
References: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5803B6C62F@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC5803B6C62F@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, DCCP mailing list <dccp@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, TSV Dir <tsv-dir@ietf.org>, ext@cisco.com, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1953143161=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org


Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) wrote:
> Murari,
...
> - or do it in piecemeal, first buy more TCP option space, standardize
> any one of the proposals for extending the TCP option space. Then have
> an extended port option like yu suggest below. Then think about other
> TCP fields requiring extension.

The problem is that buying more option space is equivalent to requiring
a whole new TCP header - it has the same problems with backward
compatibility. Previous attempts explored this space, and I think this
was Mark's motivation for a doubled-field TCP header.

Joe

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Touch                Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment
               Postel Center Director & Research Assoc. Prof., USC/ISI

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm