Re: [tcpm] SYN/ACK Payloads, draft 01

"Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org> Thu, 14 August 2008 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708483A6C45; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADF33A6C45 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.549, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIholjAAXnLv for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86493A6BB4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so445589rvf.49 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=FBewD5U7UQr2TsP6oylDEzT4YtCj3rc88T1cBVcgA+U=; b=CfX3PdROOitJ6q/uA+k2C6Pp4JMVp9lySG6Y9UgVKjo6jHwXKO6PBKsgYVnD6Vpk36 kpv0hCgZOsRR8XFJLQPOBjHcFMYZiMgdhBT/9pKbZKcKZd8KezB1aHBrXGfQIwt0Pffr 22BCrsbJZsMy+1xfnokgYhPqh7rwo8zgyvOcI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=lYc6qiWTFbZuqpMjuNir6CVRFYNorkasgLgh3HIqtzJZzCUfWEdvoWUHLRbNrFlxjV vmflAAnoH49hyRpDoDupeIwyfDWSd0aKZKGEc9AtD9UnpKc70Gjn1DAcA+CjNVm/VWyy Tw79S1z03FiZ3n6u/D7tbk6CPGRABrunDQWj0=
Received: by 10.141.113.6 with SMTP id q6mr838705rvm.135.1218733190789; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.37.3 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <396556a20808140959k639aa174wc2a5809b5b69cdbd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:59:50 -0700
From: "Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: "Joe Touch" <touch@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48A46373.4090606@isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <396556a20808111035s2b974233o1e9d3671e82e3350@mail.gmail.com> <48A35CFA.4060709@isi.edu> <396556a20808131525i20dabf06w7a7a11e3468e541a@mail.gmail.com> <48A36104.6000000@isi.edu> <396556a20808131605w2ccac3ceo21160401e4545c15@mail.gmail.com> <48A383F0.9030601@isi.edu> <396556a20808131827x1ab32b13yaa9358ac1a70c6ed@mail.gmail.com> <48A3C0B3.8050003@isi.edu> <396556a20808140940p63dec2d2ib3332b27da8260ae@mail.gmail.com> <48A46373.4090606@isi.edu>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5dc2b64016496d73
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] SYN/ACK Payloads, draft 01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
> FWIW, IMO it is not wise to deploy code into a widely-used codebase that
> uses the experimental KIND values. Experiments should be controlled.

Agreed. I've not requested that the Linux patch be applied, primarily
because it's using an experimental kind number. That's also way I'm
requesting a real option number.


Cheers

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm