IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft - thoughts and late follow-up

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 24 May 2022 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF01BC14F729; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1cWcVuWfxSo; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 616DBC14F72B; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2001:708:40:3001:75f7:2425:664f:39f4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6B7C1DA589; Tue, 24 May 2022 14:34:27 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1653392067; bh=sH9DYImrtdh3DEL/tqScxrp+AsG+yZITDPr4asBrYf8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=gISJQo8MZmp5OanQ+swZWSya605Qy2MfqkDQMvZgUMMF5c5wTa5U/jkidGc4JA17B JiG4lUDXZMxLMj+twDml34ZUI4IiQzYfw0R1QhGW11Vh/cQTkwkjJFokVs7tAn3H6O y6gODBG5ijvN1puAgK9J9a9imgtxECyV/mwG4WA0=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_94EDF5EA-6D1E-478D-9A4C-9DA609CC3B6A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <4a2b0971-1159-fe25-c31c-fcfe42c285f6@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:34:22 +0300
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <1BA23FBA-EE95-4DAE-996B-F8B7FAE9A4AC@eggert.org>
References: <CAAK044R12B3f+=2mR1ZK15Zkno5n0YvsjGy64LBiBgBN+9n71A@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6E8=fZs--fR+5Rie1NgtrA4cviatVW=Aw+qkeuqstk9DB0Hw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAK044S3RnvbTzOSHR+B26XCFEiT=YbiNGqQUH4zV4T8c9ZfgA@mail.gmail.com> <864B7333-A8EA-4C9F-A4A7-5DAB49AA4245@eggert.org> <CAAK044TGaTBYwDYU=_JC_MEH4u3Ln4T60BFzXJe681cX6eZjpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAK044TjuQyQzyHmJCyfuOTUJ5VnyPSVn+EDzdKxLPZ6uahShg@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6E8=feYY-rznoYOokRpphSRDb07MTELKPS02w9N1kwar5k4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAAK044SHORdqn8+CpwhmJaQoHB+1EqHKjD44CD++N+8JrZ3BLw@mail.gmail.com> <4a2b0971-1159-fe25-c31c-fcfe42c285f6@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Gorry Fairhust <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-MailScanner-ID: D6B7C1DA589.A4404
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/n6PrX40p4iI3IqOD6TCjX9sjC7s>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft - thoughts and late follow-up
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 11:34:43 -0000

Hi,

On 2022-5-24, at 10:43, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> I promised suggested text - but was unable to work on this after the meeting - sorry - so here goes, this is what I suggest:

thanks for this!

I used your text as the basis for https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/pull/145 - please review?

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email