Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 16 April 2009 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9233A6C28 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jK8hCpCzQ4N for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:2060:40:1::123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964A13A689B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.199] (cs95200.pp.htv.fi [212.90.95.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3GKBGVA071874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:11:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <29AE22C3-F03F-48A8-B335-A7C8E0265406@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20090402150706.EC83D28C222@core3.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-50--387533344"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:11:11 +0300
References: <20090402150706.EC83D28C222@core3.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (mail.fit.nokia.com [212.213.221.39]); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:11:17 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:10:09 -0000

Hi, authors,

the IETF last call has ended, and it looks like the few comments I've  
seen will require some text changes, so I'm placing this document in  
the Revised ID Needed state.

Also: Has the discussion of the comments that Fernando made concluded?

Lars


On 2009-4-2, at 18:07, The IESG wrote:

> The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor
> Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document:
>
> - 'Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks '
>   <draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to  
> the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-04-16. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt
>
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11735&rfc_flag=0
>
> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/421/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm