RE: [tcpm] tcpsecure: how strong to recommend?

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Tue, 02 October 2007 15:57 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ick7r-00075m-Rs; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:57:35 -0400
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ick7q-00072Y-Nc for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:57:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ick7q-00072N-7V for tcpm@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:57:34 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ick7p-0005LD-0i for tcpm@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:57:34 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,220,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="21126402"
Received: from sj-dkim-7.cisco.com ([171.68.10.88]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2007 08:57:32 -0700
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-7.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l92FvWGh031371; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:57:32 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l92FvA1o022747; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:57:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:57:27 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [tcpm] tcpsecure: how strong to recommend?
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:57:22 -0700
Message-ID: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58040A03F3@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <13D1EAB852BE194C94773A947138483D04245613@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] tcpsecure: how strong to recommend?
Thread-Index: AcgEWGCMHXhyXXRPQOSfylhZ5GAbHwAGtBYgACVf0aA=
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: "Mitesh Dalal (mdalal)" <mdalal@cisco.com>, "Edward A. Gardner" <eag@ophidian.com>, <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2007 15:57:27.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE6F09E0:01C8050C]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=426; t=1191340652; x=1192204652; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim7002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Anantha=20Ramaiah=20(ananth)=22=20<ananth@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[tcpm]=20tcpsecure=3A=20how=20strong=20to=20recommend ?=20 |Sender:=20; bh=/3fW0aH1570HvASF8dEOvhGKvBW8a1OXO29v5q6LUK0=; b=sPhZDD+AlWUWbOJLjuinlAQuzSdBMHnSMepX+ILhq89jp93np/z6Im308V48J4/eKesUOAnq g2hK8KblYlSzjvfvN8Dz0D6lruiNZ2pq76F7WxEksIBqCbVGAPYNAF2k;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-7; header.From=ananth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim7002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc:
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

 
> So to reiterate to the group, we need an applicability 
> statement that highlights the 
> implementations/deployments/applications that are RECOMMENDED 
> to have this fix, with others being OPTIONAL. However, the 
> features/changes themselves being MUST (or SHOULD, if that's 
> what it would take for a consensus). Is the group in agreement here?

++; 
(with the author hat off :-)

-Anantha


_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm